New York S 589: Enacts the "our school our rules act"
Status: REFERRED TO EDUCATION (as of 2026-01-07)
State: New York · Session: 2025-2026 · Bill: S 589
Sponsors: Jack M. Martins, Mario Mattera, Patricia Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick, Steve Rhoads
Bill Text
Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly • • • • • • • • Skip to main content New York State Assembly Speaker Carl E. Heastie --> --> --> • Assembly Members • Legislative Info • Public Hearings • Speaker's Press • Assembly Reports • Committees & More • Bill Search Home • Laws • Legislative Calendar • Public Hearing Schedule • Assembly Calendars • Assembly Committee Agenda Javascript must be enabled to properly view this page. Bill No.: • Summary • Actions • Committee Votes • Floor Votes • Memo • Text • LFIN • Chamber Video/Transcript S00589 Summary: BILL NOS00589   SAME ASSAME AS A08325   SPONSORMARTINS   COSPNSRCANZONERI-FITZPATRICK, MATTERA, RHOADS   MLTSPNSR   Add §1527-b, Ed L   Enacts the "our school our rules act"; prohibits mandatory regionalization plans. Go to top S00589 Actions: BILL NOS00589   01/08/2025REFERRED TO EDUCATION 01/07/2026REFERRED TO EDUCATION Go to topS00589 Committee Votes: Go to topS00589 Floor Votes: There are no Assembly votes for this bill in this legislative session. Go to topS00589 Text: STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 589 2025-2026 Regular Sessions IN SENATE (Prefiled) January 8, 2025 ___________ Introduced by Sens. MARTINS, CANZONERI-FITZPATRICK, MATTERA, RHOADS -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Education AN ACT to amend the education law, in relation to enacting the "our schools our rules act" The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as 2 the "our schools our rules act". 3 § 2. Legislative findings and intent. The legislature finds that local 4 school districts in the state, particularly those on Long Island, have 5 historically maintained high standards of education through locally 6 controlled governance and decision-making processes. The recent proposal 7 by the education department and the board of regents to mandate the 8 development and implementation of regionalization plans, as outlined in 9 part one hundred twenty-four of the commissioner of education's regu- 10 lations, threatens to undermine local control, dilute the quality of 11 education, and impose significant administrative burdens on local school 12 districts. The intent of this act is to preserve the autonomy of local 13 school districts by prohibiting any state-mandated regionalization of 14 local school districts. 15 § 3. The education law is amended by adding a new section 1527-b to 16 read as follows: 17 § 1527-b. Mandatory regionalization plans prohibited. 1. For the 18 purposes of this section, the term "mandatory regionalization plan" 19 shall mean any rule or policy that requires the sharing of resources, 20 administrative operations, or instructional services among two or more 21 school districts, boards of cooperative educational services (BOCES), 22 charter schools, private schools, or any combination thereof, pursuant EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD01778-01-5 S. 589 2 1 to a regulation, order, or directive issued by the commissioner, the 2 department, or the board of regents. 3 2. (a) No local school district shall be required by any regulation, 4 rule, or policy of the commissioner, the department, or the board of 5 regents to develop, implement, or participate in a mandatory regionali- 6 zation plan, including but not limited to mandatory regionalization 7 plans related to shared resources, operational efficiencies, or joint 8 educational programs. 9 (b) The department and the board of regents shall not enact, imple- 10 ment, or enforce any regulation, rule, or policy that requires local 11 school districts to develop, implement, or participate in a mandatory 12 regionalization plan. 13 3. Any regulation enacted or proposed by the commissioner that relates 14 to boards of cooperative educational services (BOCES) and requires the 15 development of regionalization plans by local school districts shall be 16 deemed null and void. The department and the board of regents shall not 17 make any effort to implement any such regulation. 18 4. Nothing in this section shall prohibit local school districts from 19 voluntarily entering into agreements or partnerships related to shared 20 services with other school districts, boards of cooperative educational 21 services (BOCES), charter schools, and private schools. 22 5. Local school districts shall retain full autonomy over such school 23 district's governance, budgeting, and operational decisions without 24 interference by the department pursuant to this section. 25 § 4. This act shall take effect i
View New York S 589 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.