Virginia SB 384: Artificial intelligence; framework for person/entity acting as an independent verification org.
Status: Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0426) (as of 2026-04-08)
State: Virginia · Session: 2026 · Bill: SB 384
Sponsors: Angelia Williams Graves
Bill Text
2026 SESSION INTRODUCED 26101618D SENATE BILL NO. 384 Offered January 14, 2026 Prefiled January 13, 2026 A BILL to amend the Code of Virginia by adding a section numbered 2.2-2012.01 and by adding in Chapter 20.1 of Title 2.2 an article numbered 9, consisting of sections numbered 2.2-2034.2 through 2.2-2034.7, relating to Virginia Information Technologies Agency; artificial intelligence; independent verification organizations. ————— Patron—Williams Graves ————— Referred to Committee on General Laws and Technology ————— Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia: 1. That the Code of Virginia is amended by adding a section numbered 2.2-2012.01 and by adding in Chapter 20.1 of Title 2.2 an article numbered 9, consisting of sections numbered 2.2-2034.2 through 2.2-2034.7, as follows: § 2.2-2012.01. Additional duties of the CIO relating to licensing of independent verification organizations of artificial intelligence. The CIO shall have the power and duty to oversee the licensing of independent verification organizations (IVOs) of artificial intelligence pursuant to Article 9 (§ 2.2-2034.2 et seq.). The CIO shall promulgate regulations necessary or incidental to the licensing of such IVOs, which shall include: 1. Conflict of interest and funding transparency requirements, including reporting requirements regarding the IVOs' funding sources and revenue generation and self-audit requirements regarding the IVOs' board composition to ensure adequate independence from the artificial intelligence industry; 2. Requirements for identifying additional IVO plan elements as needed to ensure acceptable levels of risk from IVO-verified artificial intelligence models or applications; 3. Provisions on circumstances mandating corrective action or loss of license; 4. Requirements related to the structure and terms of the Artificial Intelligence Safety Advisory Council, including the procedures for appointing additional members; and 5. Requirements related to IVO application procedures and required materials. Article 9. Independent Verification Organizations of Artificial Intelligence. § 2.2-2034.2. Definitions. As used in this article, unless the context requires a different meaning: "Artificial intelligence application" means a software program or system that uses artificial intelligence models to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence. "Artificial intelligence model" means an engineered or machine-based system that can, for explicit or implicit objectives, infer from the input it receives how to generate outputs that can influence physical or virtual environments. "Deployer" means a person or entity that implements, integrates, or makes operational an artificial intelligence model or artificial intelligence application within the Commonwealth. "Deployer" includes a person or entity that makes an artificial intelligence model or artificial intelligence application available for use by others within the Commonwealth, whether directly or as part of a product or service. "Developer" means a person or entity that develops an artificial intelligence model or artificial intelligence application that is deployed in the Commonwealth. "Independent verification organization" or "IVO" means a person or entity licensed by the Virginia Information Technologies Agency (VITA) pursuant to this article to assess artificial intelligence models' or applications' adherence to standards reflecting best practices for the prevention of personal injury and property damage. "Security vendor" means a third-party entity engaged by an IVO or developer to evaluate the safety or security of an artificial intelligence model or application, including by using processes such as red teaming, risk detection, and risk mitigation. § 2.2-2034.3. Licensing of independent verification organizations. A. Each person or entity seeking to act as an IVO within the Commonwealth shall obtain a license from VITA. B. An application for an IVO license shall be made by filing with VITA the information, materials, and forms required by this article and the regulations promulgated by the CIO pursuant to § 2.2-2012.01, along with a plan detailing all of the following information: 1. The risks with respect to which the applicant intends to verify that artificial intelligence models or artificial intelligence applications implement mitigation measures sufficient to achieve acceptable levels of risk. For each such risk, the applicant shall submit (i) a proposed definition of acceptable levels of risk; (ii) metrics that are measurable and can be used to determine whether the acceptable level of risk defined by the IVO produces beneficial outcomes; (iii) target levels for the metrics, including data sources such levels are based on and methods for measurement; and (iv) a description of the evaluation and reporting protocol to determine whether verified models or applications meet the outcome metrics on an ongoing basis.
View Virginia SB 384 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.