Connecticut SB 440: AN ACT CONCERNING UNEMPLOYMENT FOR STRIKING WORKERS.
Status: FILE NO. 367 (as of 2026-04-02)
State: Connecticut · Session: 2026 · Bill: SB 440
Subjects: Employees, Strikes, Unemployment compensation
Sponsors: Kara Rochelle, Martha Marx, Martin M. Looney, Nicholas Menapace, Nick Gauthier, Sarah Keitt, Saud Anwar
Bill Text
LCO 2706 1 of 2 General Assembly Raised Bill No. 440 February Session, 2026 LCO No. 2706 Referred to Committee on LABOR AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEES Introduced by: (LAB) AN ACT CONCERNING UNEMPLOYMENT FOR STRIKING WORKERS. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened: Section 1. Subdivision (3) of subsection (a) of section 31-236 of the 1 general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu 2 thereof (Effective October 1, 2026): 3 (3) During any week in which the administrator finds that the 4 individual's total or partial unemployment is due to the existence of a 5 labor dispute other than a lockout at the factory, establishment or other 6 premises at which the individual is or has been employed, [provided] 7 except that the provisions of this subsection do not apply if it is shown 8 to the satisfaction of the administrator that: (A) For a labor dispute that 9 begins on or after December 14, 2027, such labor dispute has been 10 continuous for fourteen days since the commencement of such labor 11 dispute; (B) (i) the individual is not participating in or financing or 12 directly interested in the labor dispute that caused the unemployment, 13 and [(B)] (ii) the individual does not belong to a trade, class or 14 organization of workers, members of which, immediately before the 15 Raised Bill No. 440 LCO 2706 2 of 2 commencement of the labor dispute, were employed at the premises at 16 which the labor dispute occurred, and are participating in or financing 17 or directly interested in the dispute; or (C) the individual's 18 unemployment is due to the existence of a lockout. A lockout exists 19 whether or not such action is to obtain for the employer more 20 advantageous terms when an employer (i) fails to provide employment 21 to its employees with whom the employer is engaged in a labor dispute, 22 either by physically closing its plant or informing its employees that 23 there will be no work until the labor dispute has terminated, or (ii) 24 makes an announcement that work will be available after the expiration 25 of the existing contract only under terms and conditions that are less 26 favorable to the employees than those current immediately prior to such 27 announcement; provided in either event the recognized or certified 28 bargaining agent shall have advised the employer that the employees 29 with whom the employer is engaged in the labor dispute are ready, able 30 and willing to continue working pending the negotiation of a new 31 contract under the terms and conditions current immediately prior to 32 such announcement; 33 This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections: Section 1 October 1, 2026 31-236(a)(3) LAB Joint Favorable
View Connecticut SB 440 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.