Connecticut SB 435: AN ACT CONCERNING AUTOMATED DECISION SYSTEMS PROTECTIONS FOR EMPLOYEES.

Status: FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN. (as of 2026-04-20)

State: Connecticut · Session: 2026 · Bill: SB 435

Subjects: Advertising, Artificial intelligence, Audits, Civil actions, Collective bargaining, Complaint, Computer software, Confidentiality, Crime victims, Disclosure, Discrimination in employment, Domestic violence, Electronic data, Electronic government information, Employees, Employers, Employment, Employment agencies, Fringe benefits, Genetic information, Hazardous substances, Human Rights and Opportunities, Commission on, Labor Department, Labor unions, Notices, Occupational training, Personal data, Public welfare, Records retention, Sexual assault, State agencies, Unfair or deceptive trade practices, Violations

Sponsors: Anne M. Hughes, Ceci Maher, David Defronzo, Eilish Collins Main, Gary A. Winfield, Hubert D. Delany, James J. Maroney, James Sanchez, Jan Hochadel, Jennifer Leeper, John-michael Parker, Jorge Cabrera, Josh Elliott, Julie Kushner, Kaitlyn Shake, Kara Rochelle, Kate Farrar, Laurie Sweet, Marcus Brown, Martha Marx, Mary Welander, Michael "mj" Shannon, Nicholas Menapace, Nick Gauthier, Rebecca Martinez

Bill Text

LCO  
 
1 of 30 
  
General Assembly  
Substitute Bill No. 435  
February Session, 2026 
 
 
 
 
 
AN ACT CONCERNING AUTOMATED DECISION SYSTEMS 
PROTECTIONS FOR EMPLOYEES.  
Be  it  enacted  by  the  Senate  and  House  of Representatives  in  General 
Assembly convened: 
 
Section 1. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2026) As used in this section and 1 
sections 2 to 13, inclusive, of this act: 2 
(1)  "Automated  employment-related  decision  process"  (A)  means  a 3 
computational  process  that  makes,  assists  in  making  or  is  used  in  the 4 
course of making an employment-related decision, (B) includes, but is 5 
not limited to, a computational process that (i) uses a computer-based 6 
assessment  or  test  to  (I)  make  a  predictive  assessment  concerning  an 7 
applicant for employment or employee, (II) measure the skills, dexterity, 8 
reaction  time  or  any  other  ability  or  characteristic  of  an  applicant  for 9 
employment or employee, (III) measure the personality traits, aptitude, 10 
attitude or cultural fit of an applicant for employment or employee, or 11 
(IV)   screen,   evaluate,   categorize   or   recommend   an   applicant   for 12 
employment  or  employee,  (ii)  directs  job  advertisements  or  other 13 
recruiting   materials   to   targeted   groups,   (iii)   screens   resumes   for 14 
particular  terms  or  patterns,  (iv)  analyzes  a  facial  expression,  word 15 
choice or voice captured during an online interview, or (v) analyzes data 16 
acquired from a third party concerning an applicant for employment or 17 
an   employee,   and   (C)   does   not   include   any   word   processing, 18 
spreadsheet,   map   navigation,   web   hosting,   domain   registration, 19 

Substitute Bill No. 435 
 
 
LCO      2 of 30 
 
networking,  caching,  Internet  web  site  loading,  data  storage,  firewall, 20 
anti-virus,  anti-malware,  spam  and  robocall  filtering,  spellchecking, 21 
calculator,  database  or  similar  software  or  technology  insofar  as  such 22 
software or technology does not make an employment-related decision; 23 
(2)   "Deploy"   means   to   put   an   automated   employment-related 24 
decision process into use; 25 
(3) "Deployer"  means  a  person  doing  business  in  the  state that 26 
deploys an automated employment-related decision process in the state; 27 
(4) "Developer"  means  a  person  doing  business  in  the  state that 28 
develops,  or  intentionally  and  substantially  modifies,  an  automated 29 
employment-related decision process; 30 
(5) "Employment-related decision" (A) means a decision regarding a 31 
term or condition of employment, and (B) includes, but is not limited to, 32 
(i)   the   decision   to   hire,   promote   or   terminate   an   applicant   for 33 
employment   or   employee,   (ii)   decisions   related   to   compensation, 34 
scheduling,   assigning   duties,   productivity   monitoring,   workplace 35 
surveillance    or    performance    evaluations    of    an    applicant    for 36 
employment  or  employee,  and  (iii)  any  other  decision  affecting  the 37 
rights,  benefits  or  obligations  of  an  applicant  for  employment  or 38 
employee; 39 
(6) "Person"  means  an  individual,  association,  corporation,  limited 40 
liability company, partnership, trust or other legal entity; 41 
(7) "Substantial factor" (A) means a factor that assists in making, and 42 
is  capable  of  altering  the  outcome  of,  an  employment-related  decision 43 
concerning an individual in the state, and (B) includes, but is not limited 44 
to,  any  use  of  an  automated  employment-related  decision  process  to 45 
generate    any    content,    decision,    prediction    or    recommendation 46 
concerning an individual in the state that is used as a basis to make an 47 
employment-related decision concerning such individual; and 48 
(8) "Trade secret" has the same meaning as provided in section 35-51 49 

Substitute Bill No. 435 
 
 
LCO      3 of 30 
 
of the general statutes. 50 
Sec.  2.  (NEW)  (Effective  October  1,  2026)  (a)  Except  as  provided  in 51 
subsection   (b)   of   this   section,   the   developer   of   an automated 52 
employment-related decision process that is deployed in the state shall 53 
provide   to   the   deployer   of   such   automated   employment-related 54 
decision process all information that such deployer requires to perform 55 
such deployer's duties under sections 3 to 6, inclusive, of this act. 56 
(b)  The  developer  of an automated  employment-related  decision 57 
process may  enter  into  a  contract  with  a  deployer  of  the automated 58 
employment-related  decision  process  to  assume  the  deployer's  duties 59 
under sections 3 to 6, inclusive, of this act. The contract shall be binding 60 
and clearly set forth which of the deployer's duties under sections 3 to 61 
6, inclusive, of this act the developer has assumed. No provision of such 62 
cont

View Connecticut SB 435 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.