Connecticut SB 469: AN ACT IMPLEMENTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE STATE CONTRACTING STANDARDS BOARD.
Status: ON CONSENT CALENDAR (as of 2026-05-05)
State: Connecticut · Session: 2026 · Bill: SB 469
Subjects: Administrative Services, Department of, Appropriations, Bids and bidding, Contractors, Governor, Policy and Management, Office of, Privatization, State Contracting Standards Board, State agencies, State contracts
Sponsors: Nicholas Menapace, Sarah Keitt, Nick Gauthier
Bill Text
LCO 1 of 7 General Assembly Substitute Bill No. 469 February Session, 2026 AN ACT IMPLEMENTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE STATE CONTRACTING STANDARDS BOARD. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened: Section 1. (NEW) (July 1, 2026) (a) Notwithstanding any provision of 1 the general statutes, the appropriations recommended for the State 2 Contracting Standards Board shall be the estimates of expenditure 3 requirements transmitted to the Secretary of the Office of Policy and 4 Management by the executive director of the board and the 5 recommended adjustments and revisions of such estimates shall be the 6 recommended adjustments and revisions, if any, transmitted by said 7 executive director to the Office of Policy and Management. 8 (b) Notwithstanding any provision of the general statutes, the 9 Governor shall not reduce allotment requisitions or allotments in force 10 concerning the State Contracting Standards Board. 11 Sec. 2. Subsection (h) of section 4e-2 of the general statutes is repealed 12 and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2026): 13 (h) The board may contract with consultants and professionals on a 14 temporary or project by project basis and [may] shall employ, subject to 15 the provisions of chapter 67, [such] not less than five full-time 16 employees and may employ such additional employees as may be 17 Substitute Bill No. 469 LCO 2 of 7 necessary to carry out the provisions of this section. 18 Sec. 3. Subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 4e-5 of the general 19 statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof 20 (Effective July 1, 2026): 21 (2) The agency procurement officer shall be responsible for [assuring] 22 (A) ensuring that any invitation to bid, request for proposals or any 23 other solicitation for goods and services issued on or after July 1, 2026, 24 contains a notice of the rights of prospective bidders, proposers or 25 prospective contractors under section 4e-36, (B) ensuring that 26 contractors are properly screened prior to the award of a contract, (C) 27 ensuring that contractors are advised of their rights under section 4e-36, 28 prior to entering into a contract on or after July 1, 2026, (D) ensuring 29 that, upon the award of such a contract, unsuccessful bidders, proposers 30 or respondents are advised of their rights under section 4e-36, (E) 31 evaluating contractor performance during and at the conclusion of a 32 contract, (F) submitting written evaluations to a central data repository 33 to be designated by the board, and (G) creating a project management 34 plan for the agency with annual reports to the board pertaining to 35 procurement projects within the agency. 36 Sec. 4. Subsection (d) of section 4e-16 of the general statutes is 37 repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 38 2026): 39 (d) [Any business case developed by a state contracting agency for 40 the purpose of complying with subsection (c) of this section shall 41 include: (1) The cost-benefit analysis as described in subsection (b) of 42 this section, (2) a detailed description of the service or activity that is the 43 subject of such business case, (3) a description and analysis of the state 44 contracting agency's current performance of such service or activity, (4) 45 the goals to be achieved through the proposed privatization contract 46 and the rationale for such goals, (5) a description of available options for 47 achieving such goals, (6) an analysis of the advantages and 48 disadvantages of each option, including, at a minimum, potential 49 Substitute Bill No. 469 LCO 3 of 7 performance improvements and risks attendant to termination of the 50 contract or rescission of such contract, (7)] Each state contracting agency 51 proposing to enter into a privatization contract shall prepare a business 52 case that includes, at a minimum, the following: (1) A description of the 53 scope of services to be privatized; (2) a cost-benefit analysis comparing 54 the costs of providing the services by the state with the costs of 55 contracting for such services; (3) an analysis of the quality of services 56 expected under privatization; (4) a risk assessment, including potential 57 risks to service continuity and accountability; (5) a transition plan 58 addressing employee transition issues, including layoffs, transfers, 59 reassignments and retraining; (6) an analysis of the potential impact of 60 the proposed privatization contract on protected classes of
View Connecticut SB 469 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.