California SCR 82: Relative to California Firefighter Appreciation Month and California Firefighters Memorial Day.
Status: Chaptered by Secretary of State. Res. Chapter 161, Statutes of 2023. (as of 2023-09-13)
State: California · Session: 20232024 · Bill: SCR 82
Subjects: California Firefighter Appreciation Month and California Firefighters Memorial Day
Sponsors: Wahab, Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Alanis, Alvarado-Gil, Alvarez, Arambula, Ashby, Bains, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Blakespear, Blanca Rubio, Boerner, Bonta, Bryan, Caballero, Calderon, Cervantes, Chen, Connolly, Cortese, Davies, Dixon
Bill Text
• • • • • • Bill Text - SCR-82 Public higher education: artificial intelligence usage. • • skip to content • home • accessibility • FAQ • feedback • sitemap • login • x Quick Search: Bill Number Bill Keyword • • • • • • Home • Bill Information • California Law • Publications • Other Resources • My Subscriptions • My Favorites • Bill Information >> • Bill Search >> • Text Bill Text PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites |Track Bill | Version: 06/11/26 - Amended Assembly 05/15/25 - Introduced SCR-82 Public higher education: artificial intelligence usage.(2025-2026) Text >> Votes >> History >> Bill Analysis >> Today's Law As Amended >> Compare Versions >> Status >> Comments To Author >> Track Bill >> Add To My Favorites >> SHARE THIS: SCR82:v98#DOCUMENTBill Start Amended IN Assembly June 11, 2026 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2025–2026 REGULAR SESSION Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 82 Introduced by Senator Niello (Coauthors: Assembly Members Fong and Sharp-Collins) May 15, 2025 Relative to artificial intelligence in public higher education. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SCR 82, as amended, Niello. Public higher education: artificial intelligence usage. This measure would encourage the President of the University of California, the Chancellor of the California State University, and the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to create a workgroup of faculty, staff, and administrators to (1) review the use of artificial intelligence in higher education, and (2) create a public report and make public on the strategies and best practices for artificial intelligence usage agreed upon by the workgroup. workgroup within one year following formation of the workgroup, and (3) submit the report to the Legislature and the relevant policy committees of the Legislature with jurisdiction over higher education and privacy and consumer protection. Digest Key Fiscal Committee: NOYES Bill Text WHEREAS, The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence presents unprecedented opportunities and challenges for both students and faculty in higher education; and WHEREAS, The University of California, California State University, and California Community Colleges are leading higher education institutions in California, the nation, and the world that play a pivotal role in shaping the academic landscape and must play an active role in fostering responsible artificial intelligence integration; and WHEREAS, These three institutions work closely together to ensure academic success for students; and WHEREAS, The collaboration between these segments is vital to the coordination of student education, services, and outcomes; and WHEREAS, Understanding how to use artificial intelligence in academic assignments is crucial to creating an environment that values innovation and knowledge while upholding academic honesty and integrity; now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate of the State of California, the Assembly thereof concurring, That the Legislature encourages the President of the University of California, theChancellor the Chancellor of the California State University, and the Chancellor for of the California Community Colleges to create a workgroup of faculty, staff, and administrators to review the use of artificial intelligence in higher education; and be it further Resolved, That the workgroup should discuss strategies and best practices that lead to the acceptable use of artificial intelligence in higher education while emphasizing academic honesty and ethical academic standards; and be it further Resolved, That the workgroup should discuss strategies and best practices for acceptable use of artificial intelligence across the three segments of California public higher education; and be it further Resolved, That the workgroup should discuss strategies and best practices for the use of artificial intelligence in academic studies, including, but not limited to, mitigating plagiarism and plagiarism, ethically using artificial intelligence in academic assignments; assignments, reasonable safeguards to protect student privacy and personal information, ensuring safe and responsible use of artificial intelligence, and mitigating user harm caused by excessive sycophancy and addictive features; and be it further Resolved, That the workgroup should discuss strategies and best practices for using artificial intelligence as it relates to providing student academic support; and be it further Resolved, That the workgroup should discuss and strategize on ways to provide professional support to professors on using artificial intelligence in student and faculty work; and be it further Resolved, That the workgroup should discuss and strategize on ways to provide professional support to professors on recognizing the use of artificial intelligence in student work, including reliable technologies for checking student work
View California SCR 82 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.