California AB 67: Juveniles: juvenile justice professionals.

Status:

State: California · Session: 19931994 Special Session 1 · Bill: AB 67

Subjects: Juveniles: juvenile justice professionals.

Sponsors: Bowler

Bill Text

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 
 Bill Text - AB-67 Attorney General: Reproductive Privacy Act: enforcement.

• 

• skip to content

• home

• accessibility

• FAQ

• feedback

• sitemap

• login

• x

 Quick Search:

 Bill Number
 Bill Keyword

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• Home

• Bill Information

• California Law

• Publications

• Other Resources

• My Subscriptions

• My Favorites

• Bill Information
 >>

• Bill Search
 >>

• Text

 Bill Text

 PDF2
 Bill PDF

 |Add To My Favorites |Track Bill | Version: 04/23/25 - Amended Assembly
 12/04/24 - Introduced

 AB-67 Attorney General: Reproductive Privacy Act: enforcement.(2025-2026)

 Text

 >>

 Votes

 >>

 History
 >>

 Bill Analysis
 >>

 Today's Law As Amended
 >>

 Compare Versions
 >>

 Status
 >>

 Comments To Author

 >>

 Track Bill
 >>

 Add To My Favorites
 >>

 SHARE THIS:

 Date Published: 04/23/2025 09:00 PM

AB67:v98#DOCUMENTBill Start

 Revised
 May 01, 2025

 Amended
 IN 
 Assembly
 April 23, 2025

 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
 2025–2026 REGULAR SESSION

 Assembly Bill

No. 67

Introduced by Assembly Member Bauer-Kahan
(Principal coauthor: Senator Pérez)
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Ortega, Schiavo, Stefani, and Wilson)

December 04, 2024

 An act to amend Section 905 of, and to add Article 11 (commencing with Section 12670) to Chapter 6 of Part 2 of Division 3 of Title 2 of of, the Government Code, relating to state government. 

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

AB 67, as amended, Bauer-Kahan.
 Attorney General: Reproductive Privacy Act: enforcement.

Existing law, the Reproductive Privacy Act, prohibits a person from being subject to civil or criminal liability, or otherwise deprived of their rights, based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome or based solely on their actions to aid or assist a woman or pregnant person who is exercising their reproductive rights as specified in the act. Existing law authorizes a party whose rights are protected by the Reproductive Privacy Act to bring a civil action against an offending state actor when those rights are interfered with by conduct or by statute, ordinance, or other state or local rule, regulation, or enactment in violation of the act, as specified, and require a court, upon a motion, to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs to a prevailing plaintiff.

This bill would
 authorize the Attorney General, if it appears to them that a person has engaged, or is about to engage, in any act or practice constituting a violation of the Reproductive Privacy Act, to bring an action in the name of the people of the State of California in the superior court to enjoin the acts or practices or to enforce compliance with the act, as specified. In this context, the bill would authorize the Attorney General to make public or private investigations, publish information concerning violation of the Reproductive Privacy Act, and subpoena witnesses, compel their attendance, take evidence, and require the production of documents or records that they deem relevant or material to the inquiry.

This bill would impose a civil penalty not exceeding $25,000 upon any person or governmental entity that violates any provision of the act and a civil penalty for violation of the bill’s provisions, to be determined as specified. The bill would require any costs, fees,
 and civil penalties collected pursuant to these provisions to be available to the office of the Attorney General upon appropriation of the Legislature for exclusive use by the Attorney General for enforcement of act.

Existing law, the Government Claims Act, generally requires that all claims for money or damages against local public entities be presented in accordance with specified law, and excepts certain claims from this requirement.

This bill would additionally except claims brought under the Reproductive Privacy Act from those requirements under the Government Claims Act.

Digest Key

 Vote:
 MAJORITY 
 Appropriation:
 NO 
 Fiscal Committee:
 YES 
 Local Program:
 NO 

Bill Text

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1.

 Section 905 of the Government Code is amended to read:

905.

 There shall be presented in accordance with Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 900) and Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 910) all claims for money or damages against local public entities except any of the following:

(a) Claims under the Revenue and Taxation Code or other statute prescribing procedures for the refund, rebate, exemption, cancellation, amendment, modification, or adjustment of any tax, assessment, fee, or charge or any portion of the charge, or of any penalties, costs, or related charges.

(b) Claims in connection with which the filing of a notice of lien, statement of claim, or stop notice is required under any law relating to liens of mechanics, laborers, or materialmen.

(c) Claims by public employees for fees, salaries, wages, mileage, or other expenses and allowances.

View California AB 67 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.