Washington SB 5523: Concerning the removal of provisions that are no longer necessary for continued publication in the Revised Code of Washington.

Status: By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status. (as of 2018-01-08)

State: Washington · Session: 2017-2018 · Bill: SB 5523

Subjects: REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON

Sponsors: Fortunato

Bill Text

S-0669.2

SENATE BILL 5523

State of Washington

65th Legislature

2017 Regular Session

By Senator Fortunato

Read first time 01/27/17. Referred to Committee on State Government.

AN ACT Relating to removal of provisions that are no longer necessary for continued publication in the Revised Code of Washington; amending RCW 43.88.0301, 48.17.563, 48.31.115, and 77.125.040; reenacting and amending RCW 46.18.060; decodifying RCW 43.88.910, 43.105.902, 43.105.903, 15.49.920, 15.49.950, 15.51.900, 15.54.930, 15.58.900, 15.58.901, 15.58.943, 41.58.900, 41.58.901, 50.98.080, 69.50.545, 69.50.606, 69.50.607, 43.215.903, 43.215.905, 48.20.322, 48.23.520, 35.98.020, 35.98.050, 35A.90.030, 35A.90.040, 74.14B.900, 74.18.903, 46.61.990, 77.15.902, 77.50.900, 77.65.900, 77.105.900, 43.31A.400, 43.63A.902, 43.63A.903, and 43.41.901; repealing RCW 69.50.1011, 28A.400.201, 70.95H.005, 70.95H.007, 70.95H.010, 70.95H.030, 70.95H.040, 70.95H.050, 70.95H.900, 70.105A.035, 70.220.060, 30A.24.080, 31.04.185, 31.45.095, 41.05.019, 41.05.230, 41.05.655, 70.47A.010, 70.47A.020, 70.47A.030, 70.47A.040, 70.47A.050, 70.47A.060, 70.47A.070, 70.47A.080, 70.47A.090, 70.47A.100, 70.47A.110, 70.47A.901, 74.12.901, 74.12A.030, 74.13.017, 26.50.800, 43.374.005, 43.374.020, 47.01.321, 47.01.350, 47.01.360, 47.01.400, 47.01.405, 47.01.406, 47.01.410, and 47.01.418; and repealing 2009 c 548 s 302 and 2010 c 236 s 6 (uncodified).

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

Sec. 1. RCW 43.88.0301 and 2002 c 312 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

RELATING TO ACCOUNTABILITY AND REFORM. (1) The office of financial management must include in its capital budget instructions, beginning with its instructions for the 2003-05 capital budget, a request for "yes" or "no" answers for the following additional informational questions from capital budget applicants for all proposed major capital construction projects valued over five million dollars and required to complete a predesign:

(a) For proposed capital projects identified in this subsection that are located in or serving city or county planning under RCW 36.70A.040:

(i) Whether the proposed capital project is identified in the host city or county comprehensive plan, including the capital facility plan, and implementing rules adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW;

(ii) Whether the proposed capital project is located within an adopted urban growth area:

(A) If at all located within an adopted urban growth area boundary, whether a project facilitates, accommodates, or attracts planned population and employment growth;

(B) If at all located outside an urban growth area boundary, whether the proposed capital project may create pressures for additional development;

(b) For proposed capital projects identified in this subsection that are requesting state funding:

(i) Whether there was regional coordination during project development;

(ii) Whether local and additional funds were leveraged;

(iii) Whether environmental outcomes and the reduction of adverse environmental impacts were examined.

(2) For projects subject to subsection (1) of this section, the office of financial management shall request the required information be provided during the predesign process of major capital construction projects to reduce long-term costs and increase process efficiency.

(3) The office of financial management, in fulfilling its duties under RCW 43.88.030(((3))) (5) to create a capital budget document, must take into account information gathered under subsections (1) and (2) of this section in an effort to promote state capital facility expenditures that minimize unplanned or uncoordinated infrastructure and development costs, support economic and quality of life benefits for existing communities, and support local government planning efforts.

(4) The office of community development must provide staff support to the office of financial management and affected capital budget applicants to help collect data required by subsections (1) and (2) of this section.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. RELATING TO ACCOUNTABILITY AND REFORM. The following sections are decodified:

(1) RCW 43.88.910 (Effective date—1975 1st ex.s. c 293);

(2) RCW 43.105.902 (Effective date—1987 c 504); and

(3) RCW 43.105.903 (Effective date—1999 c 285).

NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. RELATING TO AGRICULTURE, WATER, AND RURAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. The following sections are decodified:

(1) RCW 15.49.920 (Effective date—1969 c 63);

(2) RCW 15.49.950 (Severability—1969 c 63);

(3) RCW 15.51.900 (Effective date—2007 c 181);

(4) RCW 15.54.930 (Effective date—1967 ex.s. c 22);

(5) RCW 15.58.900 (Effective date—1971 ex.s. c 190);

(6) RCW 15.58.901 (Effective date—2000 c 96); and

(7) RCW 15.58.943 (Effective date—2003 c 212).

NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. RELATING TO COMMERCE AND LABOR. The following sections are decodified:

(1) RCW 41.58.900 (Effective dates—1975-'76 2nd ex.s. c 5);

(2) RCW 41.58.901 (Effective date—1975 1st ex.s. c 296 §§ 4, 6, and

View Washington SB 5523 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.