New York S 1203: Establishes the biometric privacy act

Bill Text

Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

 Skip to main content 

 New York State Assembly

 Speaker Carl E. Heastie

 --> 
 --> 

 --> 

• 
 Assembly Members 

• 
 Legislative Info 

• 
 Public Hearings 

• 
 Speaker's Press 

• 
 Assembly Reports 

• 
 Committees & More 

• Bill Search Home
• Laws
• Legislative Calendar
• Public Hearing Schedule
• Assembly Calendars
• Assembly Committee Agenda 

 Javascript must be enabled to properly view this page. 

 Bill No.: 

• Summary 
• Actions 
• Committee&nbspVotes 
• Floor&nbspVotes 
• Memo 
• Text 
• LFIN 
• Chamber&nbspVideo/Transcript 
S01203 Summary:

BILL NOS01203 

&nbsp

SAME ASSAME AS A02115

&nbsp

SPONSORCLEARE

&nbsp

COSPNSRBRISPORT, JACKSON, SALAZAR

&nbsp

MLTSPNSR

&nbsp

&nbsp

Repeals the Columbia University Education Mixed-Use Development Land Use Improvement and Civic Project Modified General Project Plan adopted by the empire state development corporation on December 18, 2008.

Go to top S01203 Actions:

BILL NOS01203 

&nbsp

01/08/2025REFERRED TO CORPORATIONS, AUTHORITIES AND COMMISSIONS

01/07/2026REFERRED TO CORPORATIONS, AUTHORITIES AND COMMISSIONS

Go to topS01203 Committee&nbspVotes:

Go to topS01203 Floor&nbspVotes:

There are no Assembly votes for this bill in this legislative session.

Go to topS01203 Text:

 STATE OF NEW YORK
 ________________________________________________________________________

 1203

 2025-2026 Regular Sessions

 IN SENATE

 January 8, 2025
 ___________

 Introduced by Sens. CLEARE, BRISPORT, JACKSON, SALAZAR -- read twice and
 ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on
 Corporations, Authorities and Commissions

 AN ACT to repeal the Columbia University Education Mixed-Use Development
 Land Use Improvement and Civic Project Modified General Project Plan
 adopted by the empire state development corporation on December 18,
 2008

 The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
 bly, do enact as follows:

 1 Section 1. Legislative intent. The overwhelming breadth and scope of
 2 The Columbia University Education Mixed-Use Development Land Use
 3 Improvement and Civic Project Modified General Project Plan adopted by
 4 the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) on December 18, 2008 has
 5 been of longstanding concern to residents of the 30th Senatorial
 6 District and Harlem in general. The project was vehemently opposed by
 7 many who live in the community, including those whose residences and
 8 businesses were in the area to be destroyed. Many feared that the
 9 project was not just an abject land grab by a private university, which
 10 would have no public benefit, but that it was a way to displace histor-
 11 ically settled Black residents, businesses and homeowners. Meetings and
 12 hearings were held and the community was generally opposed to and
 13 concerned about the project. Today, with soaring rents, a replete lack
 14 of affordable housing and the widespread gentrification of Black Harlem
 15 leading to historic outmigration of generational residents, the greatest
 16 fears of those who opposed this project have been realized. The project
 17 was one of the greatest abuses of the mystical standard known as
 18 "blight" accompanied by "eminent domain" that our state and nation has
 19 ever seen. The words, the process and our people were used and abused
 20 towards a predetermined end. The Appellate Division of the New York
 21 State Supreme Court agreed in 2009, finding in sum, that: The Empire
 22 State Development Corporation violated both state and federal due proc-

 EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
 [ ] is old law to be omitted.
 LBD03441-01-5

 S. 1203 2

 1 ess clauses in an effort to prevent affected property owners from
 2 obtaining necessary information. ESDC's finding of blight was "bereft
 3 of facts" to establish true blight. The ESDC's determination that the
 4 project even has a public use, benefit or civic purpose was also called
 5 into question. Most troubling of all was the pattern of collusion
 6 between the state and Columbia, a private developer trying to utilize
 7 the state's power of eminent domain to take private property. This was
 8 clearly evidenced by the ESDC and Columbia each hiring the exact same
 9 consultant to conduct the blight study that served as the rationale for
 10 triggering condemnation proceedings. For several years, groups in the
 11 Harlem Community, such as the New York State Interfaith Commission On
 12 Housing Equality, have been calling for the full repeal of this project,
 13 which, naturally, was not approved by the City Council, State Legisla-
 14 ture or any elected body whatsoever. Since the project is still open
 15 ended, and the authorization still allows actions to be taken that
 16 threaten the very existence of West Harlem and Washington Heights, the
 17 only sane approach is to repeal th