Arizona HB 2610: appropriation; US route 191
Status: house second reading (as of 2019-02-13)
State: Arizona · Session: 54th-1st-regular · Bill: HB 2610
Subjects: APPROPRIATING MONIES, APPROPRIATIONS, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Sponsors: Arlando Teller, Andres Cano, Athena Salman, Charlene R. Fernandez, César Chávez, Jamescita Peshlakai, Jennifer Longdon, Jennifer Pawlik, Myron Tsosie, Randall Friese, Raquel Terán, Victoria Steele
Bill Text
HB2610 - 572R - H Ver House Engrossed utility relocation; funding; bonds State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session 2026 HOUSE BILL 2610 AN ACT amending section 9-461.17, arizona revised statutes; relating to municipal planning. (TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona: Section 1. Section 9-461.17, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read: START_STATUTE9-461.17. Telecommunications utility relocation; cost reimbursement; definitions A. To the fullest extent allowed by law, If any construction project in any municipality that is undertaken individually or jointly by an intergovernmental contract and that is funded in whole or in part by voter-approved municipal bond proceeds requires that a telecommunications utility adjust or otherwise relocate the telecommunications utility's facilities, the municipality shall reimburse the telecommunications utility, or cause the telecommunications utility to be reimbursed, for the telecommunications utility's relocation costs incurred on facilities located within the municipal boundaries. B. If the telecommunications utility has existing land rights, the municipality shall provide at the municipality's expense the telecommunications utility with equal land rights in the new location of the relocated facilities. If the telecommunications utility's existing facilities are located in the right-of-way under a permit, the municipality shall provide at the municipality's expense the telecommunications utility with rights in the new location of the relocated facilities equivalent to the telecommunications utility's existing rights under the permit. C. A telecommunications utility shall submit a verified itemized claim to the municipality for reimbursement of relocation costs within one hundred eighty days after each calendar quarter in which a telecommunications utility incurs relocation costs. D. The municipality shall: 1. Review each verified itemized claim submitted pursuant to subsection C of this section. The review may include an audit conducted pursuant to standard industry accounting principles. 2. Reimburse the telecommunications utility for the relocation costs within ninety days after receipt of the verified itemized claim. 3. Reimburse verified itemized claims from all affected telecommunications utilities in the order of receipt. 4. At least thirty days before a request to relocate a telecommunications utility's facility, Provide the telecommunications utility with public notice of any voter-approved municipal bond project. 5. Develop a reimbursement process for a telecommunications utility to apply for REIMBURSEMENT of the RELOCATION costs of the telecommunications utility's facilities. E. The reimbursement limitation for paid claims of relocation costs for telecommunications utility facilities for which there are no existing land rights is not more than two percent of the total project monies. The total of the project monies is the total dollar amount of all voter-approved municipal bond proceeds that fund a construction project from time to time. F. The total amount of reimbursement paid for claims of relocation costs of all telecommunications utility facilities for which there are no existing land rights may not exceed the reimbursement limitation. G. If a verified itemized claim causes the total amount of all claims for telecommunications utility relocation costs to exceed the reimbursement limitation, that claim shall be reduced so that the total amount of reimbursement paid for all claims for which there are no existing land rights equals the reimbursement limitation. H. If the dollar amount of the reimbursement limitation increases as a result of an increase in total project funds after the previous reimbursement limitation is exhausted, within thirty days after the reimbursement limitation is increased the municipality shall resume processing previously submitted and new verified itemized claims under this section. I. The reimbursement limitation does not apply to any claims for reimbursement of relocation costs for telecommunications utility facilities with existing land rights or any amounts paid by the municipality to provide equivalent land or permit rights. These claims and amounts are excluded from the reimbursement limitation. J. This section does not: 1. Apply to a construction project funded in whole or in part with voter-approved municipal bond proceeds if approval of the bonds was referred to the voters, or the initiative petition for the bonds was applied for, before January 1, 2017. 2. Prohibit a municipality from complying with other applicable law, or with an agreement, that requires the municipality to reimburse a telecommunications utility for more relocation costs than this section provides. K. For the purposes of this section: 1. "Int
View Arizona HB 2610 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.