California AB 660: Food and beverage products: labeling: quality dates, safety dates, and sell-by dates.

Status: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 911, Statutes of 2024. (as of 2024-09-28)

State: California · Session: 20232024 · Bill: AB 660

Subjects: Food and beverage products, labeling, quality dates, safety dates, and sell-by dates

Sponsors: Irwin, Allen, Rubio

Bill Text

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 
 Bill Text - AB-660 Planning and Zoning Law: postentitlement phase permits: Housing Accountability Act.

• 

• skip to content

• home

• accessibility

• FAQ

• feedback

• sitemap

• login

• x

 Quick Search:

 Bill Number
 Bill Keyword

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• Home

• Bill Information

• California Law

• Publications

• Other Resources

• My Subscriptions

• My Favorites

• Bill Information
 >>

• Bill Search
 >>

• Text

 Bill Text

 PDF2
 Bill PDF

 |Add To My Favorites |Track Bill | Version: 07/17/25 - Amended Senate
 07/03/25 - Amended Senate
 06/25/25 - Amended Senate
 04/24/25 - Amended Assembly
 04/09/25 - Amended Assembly
 03/24/25 - Amended Assembly
 02/14/25 - Introduced

 AB-660 Planning and Zoning Law: postentitlement phase permits: Housing Accountability Act.(2025-2026)

 Text

 >>

 Votes

 >>

 History
 >>

 Bill Analysis
 >>

 Today's Law As Amended
 >>

 Compare Versions
 >>

 Status
 >>

 Comments To Author

 >>

 Track Bill
 >>

 Add To My Favorites
 >>

 SHARE THIS:

 Date Published: 07/17/2025 09:00 PM

AB660:v93#DOCUMENTBill Start

 Amended
 IN 
 Senate
 July 17, 2025

 Amended
 IN 
 Senate
 July 03, 2025

 Amended
 IN 
 Senate
 June 25, 2025

 Amended
 IN 
 Assembly
 April 24, 2025

 Amended
 IN 
 Assembly
 April 09, 2025

 Amended
 IN 
 Assembly
 March 24, 2025

 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
 2025–2026 REGULAR SESSION

 Assembly Bill

No. 660

Introduced by Assembly Member Wilson
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Ransom, Blanca Rubio, Wicks, and Haney)

February 14, 2025

An act to amend Sections 65589.5 and 65913.3 of the Government Code, relating to planning and zoning. 

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

AB 660, as amended, Wilson.
 Planning and Zoning Law: postentitlement phase permits: Housing Accountability Act.

(1) The Planning and Zoning Law requires a local agency, as defined, to compile one or more lists that specify in detail the information required from any applicant for a postentitlement phase permit, as defined. Existing law also establishes time limits for completing reviews regarding whether an application for a postentitlement phase permit is complete and compliant, and whether to approve or deny an application. If a local agency finds that a complete application is noncompliant, existing law requires the local agency to provide the applicant with a list of items that are noncompliant and a description of how the application can be remedied by the applicant within specified time limits. Existing law requires the time limits to be tolled, if the local agency requires review of the application by an outside entity, until the outside entity completes the review
 and returns the application to the local agency, as specified.

This bill would prohibit the local agency from requiring or requesting more than 2 plan check and specification reviews in connection with an application for a building permit, as part of its review, except as specified. The bill would authorize a local agency to deny an application that is not compliant with the permit standards following 2 submittals. plan check and specification reviews. The bill would also authorize an applicant to request additional submittals of applications that are not compliant with the permit standards. The bill, if a local agency finds that a complete application is noncompliant, would prohibit a local agency from requesting or requiring any action or inaction as a result of a building
 inspection undertaken to assess compliance with the applicable building permit standards that would represent a deviation from a previously approved building plan or similar approval for the building permit, except as specified. The

 This bill would remove the above-described tolling requirements relating to outside entity reviews. reviews and, instead, would require, if federal or state law requires review of the application by another public agency that is independent of the local agency before the local agency is authorized to act on
 the application, the time limits to be tolled for the application until the public agency completes the review and returns the application to the local agency. The bill would require the local agency to notify the applicant, within 3 business days of the start of the tolling and within 3 business days of the resumption of the time limit, of the tolling and the resumption of the time limit, respectively. 

(2) Existing law, if a postentitlement phase permit is determined to be incomplete or noncompliant, requires a local agency to provide a process for an applicant to appeal that decision in writing to the governing body of the agency or, if there is no governing body, to the director of the agency, as provided by that agency. Existing law requires the city or county to provide that the right of appeal is to the governing body or, at their option, the planning commission, or both. 

Existing law requires a local agency to provide a final written determination on the appeal not later than 60 b

View California AB 660 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.