Washington SB 5612: Modifying the sales and use tax for cultural access programs by allowing the tax to be imposed by a councilmanic or commission authority and defining timelines and priorities for action.
Status: By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status. (as of 2024-01-08)
State: Washington · Session: 2023-2024 · Bill: SB 5612
Sponsors: Lovelett, Frame, Liias, Pedersen
Bill Text
AN ACT Relating to a categorical exemption for multiunit housing 1 development within the incorporated areas in an urban growth area 2 under the state environmental policy act; and amending RCW 3 43.21C.229.4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:5 Sec. 1. RCW 43.21C.229 and 2023 c 368 s 1 are each amended to 6 read as follows:7 (1) The purpose of this section is to accommodate infill and 8 housing development and thereby realize the goals and policies of 9 comprehensive plans adopted according to chapter 36.70A RCW.10 (2) A city or county planning under RCW 36.70A.040 is authorized 11 by this section to establish categorical exemptions from the 12 requirements of this chapter. An exemption may be adopted by a city 13 or county under this subsection if it meets the following criteria:14 (a) It categorically exempts government action related to 15 development proposed to fill in an urban growth area, designated 16 according to RCW 36.70A.110, where current density and intensity of 17 use in the area is roughly equal to or lower than called for in the 18 goals and policies of the applicable comprehensive plan and the 19 development is either:20 (i) Residential development;21 S-0666.2 SENATE BILL 5612 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session By Senators Salomon, Liias, and Nobles Read first time 01/31/25. Referred to Committee on Housing. p. 1 SB 5612 (ii) Mixed-use development; or1 (iii) Commercial development up to 65,000 square feet, excluding 2 retail development;3 (b) It does not exempt government action related to development 4 that is inconsistent with the applicable comprehensive plan or would 5 clearly exceed the density or intensity of use called for in the 6 goals and policies of the applicable comprehensive plan;7 (c) The local government considers the specific probable adverse 8 environmental impacts of the proposed action and determines that 9 these specific impacts are adequately addressed by the development 10 regulations or other applicable requirements of the comprehensive 11 plan, subarea plan element of the comprehensive plan, planned action 12 ordinance, or other local, state, or federal rules or laws; and13 (d)(i) The city or county's applicable comprehensive plan was 14 previously subjected to environmental analysis through an 15 environmental impact statement under the requirements of this chapter 16 prior to adoption; or17 (ii) The city or county has prepared an environmental impact 18 statement that considers the proposed use or density and intensity of 19 use in the area proposed for an exemption under this section.20 (3) All project actions that propose to develop one or more 21 residential housing units within the incorporated areas in an urban 22 growth area designated pursuant to RCW 36.70A.110 or middle housing 23 within the unincorporated areas in an urban growth area designated 24 pursuant to RCW 36.70A.110, and that meet the criteria identified in 25 (a) and (b) of this subsection, are categorically exempt from the 26 requirements of this chapter. For purposes of this section, "middle 27 housing" has the same meaning as in RCW 36.70A.030 as amended by 28 chapter 332, Laws of 2023. Jurisdictions shall satisfy the following 29 criteria prior to the adoption of the categorical exemption under 30 this subsection (3):31 (a) The city or county shall find that the proposed development 32 is consistent with all development regulations implementing an 33 applicable comprehensive plan adopted according to chapter 36.70A RCW 34 by the jurisdiction in which the development is proposed, with the 35 exception of any development regulation that is inconsistent with 36 applicable provisions of chapter 36.70A RCW; and37 (b) The city or county has prepared environmental analysis that 38 considers the proposed use or density and intensity of use in the 39 area proposed for an exemption under this section and analyzes 40 p. 2 SB 5612 multimodal transportation impacts, including impacts to neighboring 1 jurisdictions, transit facilities, and the state transportation 2 system.3 (i) Such environmental analysis shall include documentation that 4 the requirements for environmental analysis, protection, and 5 mitigation for impacts to elements of the environment have been 6 adequately addressed for the development exempted. The requirements 7 may be addressed in locally adopted comprehensive plans, subarea 8 plans, adopted development regulations, other applicable local 9 ordinances and regulations, or applicable state and federal 10 regulations. The city or county must document its consultation with 11 the department of transportation on impacts to state-owned 12 transportation facilities including consideration of whether 13 mitigation is necessary for impacts to transportation facilities.14 (ii) Before finalizing the environmental analysis pursuant to 15 (b)(i) of this subsection (3), the city or county shall provide a 16 minimum of 60 days' notice to affect
View Washington SB 5612 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.