Washington SB 6105: Enacting the reproductive health access for all act.
Status: First reading, referred to Health & Long Term Care. (as of 2018-01-08)
State: Washington · Session: 2017-2018 · Bill: SB 6105
Subjects: NAMED ACTS, HEALTH AND SAFETY, PUBLIC, HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY, ABORTION, WOMEN
Sponsors: Ranker, Carlyle, Cleveland, Darneille, Dhingra, Frockt, Hasegawa, Hunt, Keiser, Kuderer, Liias, McCoy, Mullet, Nelson, Palumbo, Wellman
Bill Text
AN ACT Relating to raising the exemption from garnishment of 1 earnings for judgments arising from medical debt; and amending RCW 2 6.27.150, 6.27.105, and 6.27.140.3 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:4 Sec. 1. RCW 6.27.150 and 2021 c 35 s 3 are each amended to read 5 as follows:6 (1) Except as provided in subsections (2) ((and (3))) through (4) 7 of this section, if the garnishee is an employer owing the defendant 8 earnings, then for each week of such earnings, an amount shall be 9 exempt from garnishment which is the greatest of the following:10 (a) Thirty-five times the federal minimum hourly wage in effect 11 at the time the earnings are payable; or12 (b) Seventy-five percent of the disposable earnings of the 13 defendant.14 (2) In the case of a garnishment based on a court order for 15 spousal maintenance, other than a mandatory wage assignment order 16 pursuant to chapter 26.18 RCW, or a mandatory assignment of 17 retirement benefits pursuant to chapter 41.50 RCW, the exemption 18 shall be fifty percent of the disposable earnings of the defendant.19 (3) In the case of a garnishment based on a judgment or other 20 order for the collection of private student loan debt, for each week 21 S-3519.1 SENATE BILL 6105 State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session By Senators Liias, Harris, Stanford, Alvarado, Bateman, Conway, Hasegawa, Lovelett, Nobles, Riccelli, Saldaña, Salomon, Slatter, Trudeau, Valdez, and Wellman Read first time 01/13/26. Referred to Committee on Law & Justice. p. 1 SB 6105 of such earnings, an amount shall be exempt from garnishment which is 1 the greater of the following:2 (a) Fifty times the minimum hourly wage of the highest minimum 3 wage law in the state at the time the earnings are payable; or4 (b) Eighty-five percent of the disposable earnings of the 5 defendant.6 (4)(a) In the case of a garnishment based on a judgment or other 7 order for the collection of consumer debt, except medical debt, for 8 each week of such earnings, an amount shall be exempt from 9 garnishment which is the greater of the following:10 (((a))) (i) Thirty-five times the state minimum hourly wage; or11 (((b))) (ii) Eighty percent of the disposable earnings of the 12 defendant.13 (b) In the case of a garnishment based on a judgment or other 14 order for the collection of medical debt, for each week of such 15 earnings, an amount shall be exempt from garnishment which is the 16 greater of the following:17 (i) Sixty times the state minimum hourly wage; or18 (ii) Eighty percent of the disposable earnings of the defendant.19 (5) The exemptions stated in this section shall apply whether 20 such earnings are paid, or are to be paid, weekly, monthly, or at 21 other intervals, and whether earnings are due the defendant for one 22 week, a portion thereof, or for a longer period.23 (6) Unless directed otherwise by the court, the garnishee shall 24 determine and deduct exempt amounts under this section as directed in 25 the writ of garnishment and answer, and shall pay these amounts to 26 the defendant.27 (7) No money due or earned as earnings as defined in RCW 6.27.010 28 shall be exempt from garnishment under the provisions of RCW 29 6.15.010, as now or hereafter amended.30 Sec. 2. RCW 6.27.105 and 2021 c 35 s 1 are each amended to read 31 as follows:32 (1) A writ that is issued for a continuing lien on earnings shall 33 be substantially in the following form, but:34 (a) If the writ is issued under an order or judgment for private 35 student loan debt, the following statement shall appear conspicuously 36 in the caption: "This garnishment is based on a judgment or order for 37 private student loan debt";38 p. 2 SB 6105 (b) If the writ is issued under an order or judgment for consumer 1 debt, except medical debt, the following statement shall appear 2 conspicuously in the caption: "This garnishment is based on a 3 judgment or order for consumer debt"; ((and))4 (c) If the writ is issued under an order or judgment for medical 5 debt, the following statement shall appear conspicuously in the 6 caption: "This garnishment is based on a judgment or order for 7 medical debt"; and8 (d) If the writ is issued by an attorney, the writ shall be 9 revised as indicated in subsection (2) of this section:10 11 12 13 "IN THE . . . . . COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF . . . . . . 14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , 15 Plaintiff, No. . . . . 16 vs. 17 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , WRIT OF 18 Defendant GARNISHMENT FOR 19 CONTINUING LIEN ON 20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , EARNINGS 21 Garnishee 22 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON TO:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Garnishee 24 AND TO:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Defendant 26 27 28 29 30 The above-named plaintiff has applied for a writ of garnishment against you, claiming that the above-named defendant is indebted to plaintiff and that the amount
View Washington SB 6105 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.