California SB 99: Active Transportation Program.

Status: Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 359, Statutes of 2013. (as of 2013-09-26)

State: California · Session: 20132014 · Bill: SB 99

Subjects: Active Transportation Program.

Sponsors: Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Bill Text

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 
 Bill Text - SB-99 Military protective orders.

• 

• skip to content

• home

• accessibility

• FAQ

• feedback

• sitemap

• login

• x

 Quick Search:

 Bill Number
 Bill Keyword

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• Home

• Bill Information

• California Law

• Publications

• Other Resources

• My Subscriptions

• My Favorites

• Bill Information
 >>

• Bill Search
 >>

• Text

 Bill Text

 PDF2
 Bill PDF

 |Add To My Favorites |Track Bill | Version: 06/04/26 - Amended Assembly
 01/22/26 - Amended Senate
 01/15/26 - Amended Senate
 01/05/26 - Amended Senate
 04/23/25 - Amended Senate
 04/01/25 - Amended Senate
 01/23/25 - Introduced

 SB-99 Military protective orders.(2025-2026)

 Text

 >>

 Votes

 >>

 History
 >>

 Bill Analysis
 >>

 Today's Law As Amended
 >>

 Compare Versions
 >>

 Status
 >>

 Comments To Author

 >>

 Track Bill
 >>

 Add To My Favorites
 >>

 SHARE THIS:

 Date Published: 06/04/2026 09:00 PM

SB99:v93#DOCUMENTBill Start

 Revised
 June 09, 2026

 Amended
 IN 
 Assembly
 June 04, 2026

 Amended
 IN 
 Senate
 January 22, 2026

 Amended
 IN 
 Senate
 January 15, 2026

 Amended
 IN 
 Senate
 January 05, 2026

 Amended
 IN 
 Senate
 April 23, 2025

 Amended
 IN 
 Senate
 April 01, 2025

 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
 2025–2026 REGULAR SESSION

 Senate Bill

No. 99

Introduced by Senator Blakespear
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Dixon and Stefani)

January 23, 2025

 An act to amend Section 6383 of, and to add Section 6310 to, the Family Code, relating to protective orders.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

SB 99, as amended, Blakespear.
 Military protective orders.

Existing law establishes the Domestic Violence Prevention Act for the purpose of preventing acts of domestic violence, abuse, and sexual abuse and providing for a separation of the persons involved in the domestic violence for a period sufficient to enable those persons to seek a resolution of the causes of the violence. Existing law authorizes a court to issue an ex parte protective order enjoining a party from, among other things, stalking, battering, or disturbing the peace of the other party.

This bill would authorize a court determining whether to issue a protective order to consider whether evidence submitted to it by either party that a military
 protective order has been issued against the respondent, as specified.

The bill would additionally require a law enforcement officer who receives information at the scene of a domestic violence incident that a military protective order has been issued to verify the existence of that order. The bill would require a law enforcement officer who determines that a military protective order has been issued against a person involved in the domestic violence incident who violates a provision of a domestic violence protective order to notify the law enforcement agency that entered the military protective order that the restrained party may be in violation of a military protective order. By increasing duties on local law enforcement, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The bill would authorize each law enforcement agency in the state that petitions for or enforces domestic violence protective orders to develop and
 adopt memoranda of understanding with military law enforcement or other designated representatives of one or more military installations located in whole or in part within the borders of its jurisdiction that govern the investigation and actions related to domestic violence involving service members assigned to units on those installations, as specified.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Digest Key

 Vote:
 MAJORITY 
 Appropriation:
 NO 
 Fiscal Committee:
 YES 
 Local Program:
 YES 

Bill Text

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1.

 Section 6310 is added to the Family Code, to read:

6310.

 (a) In determining whether to issue an order under this Part, the court may consider whether evidence submitted to it by either party that a military protective order has been issued against the respondent for the same or similar conduct against a person to be protected by the proposed order.

(b) For the purposes of this section, “military protective order” means a protective order issued by a commanding officer in the Armed Forces of the United States, California National Guard, or the national guard of another state or territory against a person under the
 officer’s command.

SEC. 2.

 Section 6383 of the Family Code is amended to read:

6383.

 (a) A temporary restraining order, emergency protective order, or an order issued af

View California SB 99 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.