New Mexico SB 40: INTERLOCK FOR DRIVING ON REVOKED LICENSE
Status: action postponed indefinitely (as of 2025-06-03)
State: New Mexico · Session: 2025 · Bill: SB 40
Subjects: CRIMES & PENALTIES, MOTOR VEHICLES (autos, trucks, buses, cycles)
Sponsors: Maestas, Antonio
Bill Text
underscored material = new[bracketed material ] = delete 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SENATE BILL 40 57TH LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2025 INTRODUCED BY Antonio Maestas AN ACT RELATING TO MOTOR VEHICLES; REQUIRING THE INSTALLATION OF AN IGNITION INTERLOCK DEVICE AND THE OBTAINING OF AN IGNITION INTERLOCK LICENSE UPON CONVICTION OF DRIVING ON A REVOKED LICENSE; MAKING DRIVING ON A REVOKED LICENSE A CASE OF RECORD IN METROPOLITAN COURT; PROVIDING THAT AN IGNITION INTERLOCK LICENSE IS VALID FOR FOUR OR EIGHT YEARS; PROVIDING THAT AN IGNITION INTERLOCK MAY BE REMOVED WITHOUT A COURT ORDER; AMENDING ELEMENTS TO QUALIFY FOR THE INTERLOCK DEVICE FUND. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO: SECTION 1. Section 34-8A-6 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1979, Chapter 346, Section 6, as amended) is amended to read: "34-8A-6. METROPOLITAN COURT--RULES--APPEAL.-- A. The supreme court shall adopt separate rules of procedure for the metropolitan courts. The rules shall provide .229071.5 underscored material = new[bracketed material ] = delete 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 simple procedures for the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of any metropolitan court action. B. Other than for actions brought pursuant to the Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act, the metropolitan court is a court of record for civil actions. Any party aggrieved by a judgment rendered by the metropolitan court in a civil action may appeal to the court of appeals. The manner and method for the appeal shall be set forth by supreme court rule. C. The metropolitan court is not a court of record for civil actions brought pursuant to the Uniform Owner- Resident Relations Act. Any party aggrieved by a judgment rendered by the metropolitan court in a civil action brought pursuant to the Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act may appeal to the district court of the county in which the metropolitan court is located within fifteen days after the judgment was rendered. The appeal shall be de novo. D. The metropolitan court is a court of record for criminal actions involving driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs, involving driving on a revoked license or involving domestic violence. A criminal action involving domestic violence means an assault or battery under any state law or municipal or county ordinance in which the alleged victim is a household member as defined in the Family Violence Protection Act. Any party aggrieved by a judgment rendered by the metropolitan court in a criminal action .229071.5 - 2 - underscored material = new[bracketed material ] = delete 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 involving driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs, involving driving on a revoked license or involving domestic violence may appeal to the court of appeals. The manner and method of appeal shall be set forth by supreme court rule. E. The metropolitan court is not a court of record for criminal actions other than driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs, driving on a revoked license or domestic violence actions. Any party aggrieved by a judgment rendered by the metropolitan court in a criminal action, other than driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs, driving on a revoked license or domestic violence action, may appeal to the district court of the county in which the metropolitan court is located within fifteen days after the judgment was rendered. The appeal shall be de novo. F. All judgments rendered in civil actions in the metropolitan court shall be subject to the same provisions of law as those rendered in district court." SECTION 2. Section 66-5-39.1 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2013, Chapter 163, Section 3) is amended to read: "66-5-39.1. DRIVING WHILE LICENSE REVOKED--PENALTIES.-- A. A person who drives a motor vehicle on a public highway of this state at a time when the person's privilege to do so is revoked and who knows or should have known that the .229071.5 - 3 - underscored material = new[bracketed material ] = delete 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 person's license was revoked is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be charged with a violation of this section. Upon conviction, the person shall be punished, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 31-18-13 NMSA 1978, by imprisonment for not less than four days or more than three hundred sixty-four days or by participation for an equivalent period of time in a certified alternative sentencing program, and there may be imposed in addition a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000). When a person pays any or all of the cost of participating in a certified alternative sentencing program, the court may apply that payment as a deduction to any fine imposed by the court. B. Notwithstanding any other provision of law for suspension
View New Mexico SB 40 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.