New York S 9092: Relates to mandatory continuing education for teachers relating to immigrant focused trauma-informed practices

Bill Text

Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

 Skip to main content 

 New York State Assembly

 Speaker Carl E. Heastie

 --> 
 --> 

 --> 

• 
 Assembly Members 

• 
 Legislative Info 

• 
 Public Hearings 

• 
 Speaker's Press 

• 
 Assembly Reports 

• 
 Committees & More 

• Bill Search Home
• Laws
• Legislative Calendar
• Public Hearing Schedule
• Assembly Calendars
• Assembly Committee Agenda 

 Javascript must be enabled to properly view this page. 

 Bill No.: 

• Summary 
• Actions 
• Committee&nbspVotes 
• Floor&nbspVotes 
• Memo 
• Text 
• LFIN 
• Chamber&nbspVideo/Transcript 
S09092 Summary:

BILL NOS09092 

&nbsp

SAME ASSAME AS A10129

&nbsp

SPONSORPALUMBO

&nbsp

COSPNSRADDABBO

&nbsp

MLTSPNSR

&nbsp

Amd §2, add Art 11 §§170 - 173, Indian L

&nbsp

Provides for the reinstatement of state recognition and acknowledgement of the Montaukett Indian Nation; provides that the Montaukett Indian nation shall have a chief or sachem, three tribal trustees and a tribal secretary; provides for the qualification of voters; makes related provisions.

Go to top S09092 Actions:

BILL NOS09092 

&nbsp

02/02/2026REFERRED TO INVESTIGATIONS AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS

04/20/20261ST REPORT CAL.718

04/21/20262ND REPORT CAL.

04/22/2026ADVANCED TO THIRD READING 

05/12/2026SUBSTITUTED BY A10129

&nbspA10129 AMEND= Schiavoni

&nbsp02/02/2026referred to judiciary

&nbsp03/04/2026reported 

&nbsp03/05/2026advanced to third reading cal.284

&nbsp03/09/2026passed assembly

&nbsp03/09/2026delivered to senate

&nbsp03/09/2026REFERRED TO INVESTIGATIONS AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS

&nbsp05/12/2026SUBSTITUTED FOR S9092

&nbsp05/12/20263RD READING CAL.718

&nbsp05/12/2026PASSED SENATE

&nbsp05/12/2026RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY

Go to topS09092 Committee&nbspVotes:

Go to topS09092 Floor&nbspVotes:

There are no Assembly votes for this bill in this legislative session.

Go to topS09092 Text:

 STATE OF NEW YORK
 ________________________________________________________________________

 9092

 IN SENATE

 February 2, 2026
 ___________

 Introduced by Sen. PALUMBO -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
 printed to be committed to the Committee on Investigations and Govern-
 ment Operations

 AN ACT to amend the Indian law, in relation to the reinstatement of
 state recognition and acknowledgement of the Montaukett Indian Nation

 The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
 bly, do enact as follows:

 1 Section 1. Legislative findings. The Montaukett Indian Nation seeks
 2 reinstatement of its recognition and acknowledgment by the state of New
 3 York. Such recognition and acknowledgment was improperly removed from
 4 the Montaukett Indian Nation in 1910 in the case of Pharaoh v. Benson,
 5 69 Misc. Rep. 241(Supreme, Suffolk Co., 1910) affirmed 164 App. Div. 51,
 6 affirmed 222 N.Y. 665, when the Montaukett Indian Nation was declared to
 7 be "extinct".
 8 The court ruled that "the tribe has disintegrated and been absorbed
 9 into the mass of citizens and at the time of commencement of this action
 10 there was no tribe of Montaukett Indians". This arbitrary ruling
 11 ignored earlier U.S. Supreme Court decisions defining Indian Nations
 12 according to criteria under which the Montaukett Indian Nation qualified
 13 as an existing sovereign tribe and giving Congress, rather than the
 14 courts, power to decide the status of an Indian.
 15 In the first of these U.S. Supreme Court decisions, United States v.
 16 Roger, 45 U.S. 567 (1848), the court ruled that the primary criteria for
 17 Indian identity was evidence that an Indian had to have some genealogi-
 18 cal connection with a recognized group that had existed before the
 19 arrival of the European white explorers, traders, and settlers. Veri-
 20 fied evidence demonstrates that the Montaukett Indian Nation existed
 21 prior to the Doctrine of Discovery and, as a sovereign tribe, ruled from
 22 the end of the Island to what is today the town of Hempstead.
 23 Subsequently, a decade before the Montaukett decision, in Montoya v.
 24 U.S., 180 U.S. 261 (1901), the U.S. Supreme Court further defined an
 25 Indian tribe as "a body of Indians of the same or similar race, united
 26 in a community under one leadership or government, and inhabiting a

 EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
 [ ] is old law to be omitted.
 LBD07499-01-5

 S. 9092 2

 1 particular though sometimes well-defined territory". The Montaukett
 2 Indian Nation also met this criteria.
 3 Further, at the time of Pharaoh v. Benson decision, the judicial
 4 branches of state and federal governments had no authority to determine
 5 the status of an Indian tribe. Only the U.S. Congress had such power. In
 6 1903, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the United States v. Rickert, 188
 7 U.S. 432 (1903) that only Congress can determine when changes in customs
 8 are sufficient to invalidate tr