Massachusetts H 1956: An Act relative to the hospitality comeback
Status: Accompanied a study order, see H5023 (as of 2022-09-06)
State: Massachusetts · Session: 192nd · Bill: H 1956
Sponsors: Marjorie C. Decker, Adrian C. Madaro, Andres X. Vargas, Brandy Fluker Oakley, Carlos González, Christine P. Barber, Daniel J. Hunt, David Biele, David Henry Argosky LeBoeuf, Erika Uyterhoeven, James B. Eldridge, Jessica Ann Giannino, Kenneth I. Gordon, Lindsay N. Sabadosa, Liz Miranda, Maria Duaime Robinson, Natalie M. Higgins, Steven C. Owens, Steven Ultrino, Thomas M. Stanley, Tommy Vitolo, Tram T. Nguyen, Walter F. Timilty
Bill Text
1 of 2 HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 3480 FILED ON: 2/19/2021 HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 1956 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts _________________ PRESENTED BY: Marjorie C. Decker _________________ To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General Court assembled: The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill: An Act relative to the hospitality comeback. _______________ PETITION OF: NAME: DISTRICT/ADDRESS: DATE ADDED: Marjorie C. Decker 25th Middlesex 2/19/2021 Steven Ultrino 33rd Middlesex 3/8/2021 David Henry Argosky LeBoeuf 17th Worcester 3/10/2021 Andres X. Vargas 3rd Essex 3/9/2021 Carlos González 10th Hampden 3/12/2021 Tommy Vitolo 15th Norfolk 3/14/2021 Daniel J. Hunt 13th Suffolk 3/18/2021 David Biele 4th Suffolk 3/23/2021 Jessica Ann Giannino 16th Suffolk 3/25/2021 Walter F. Timilty Norfolk, Bristol and Plymouth 3/30/2021 Lindsay N. Sabadosa 1st Hampshire 4/1/2021 Maria Duaime Robinson 6th Middlesex 4/1/2021 Steven C. Owens 29th Middlesex 4/6/2021 Adrian C. Madaro 1st Suffolk 4/19/2021 Liz Miranda 5th Suffolk 4/20/2021 Thomas M. Stanley 9th Middlesex 4/20/2021 Kenneth I. Gordon 21st Middlesex 4/22/2021 Christine P. Barber 34th Middlesex 4/23/2021 2 of 2 James B. Eldridge Middlesex and Worcester 4/25/2021 Tram T. Nguyen 18th Essex 5/11/2021 Brandy Fluker Oakley 12th Suffolk 5/11/2021 Erika Uyterhoeven 27th Middlesex 5/21/2021 Natalie M. Higgins 4th Worcester 7/22/2021 1 of 4 HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 3480 FILED ON: 2/19/2021 HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 1956 By Ms. Decker of Cambridge, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1956) of Marjorie C. Decker and others relative to protecting certain hospitality workers. Labor and Workforce Development. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts _______________ In the One Hundred and Ninety-Second General Court (2021-2022) _______________ An Act relative to the hospitality comeback. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 SECTION 1. Chapter 149 of the General Laws is hereby amended by adding the 2 following section:- 3 Section 204. (a) As used in this section, unless the context clearly implies otherwise, the 4 following words shall have the following meanings:- 5 “Employer”, a hotel employer. 6 “Hotel employer”, an owner, operator or manager of a residential building designated or 7 used for public lodging or other related service for the public that: (i) contains 50 or more 8 guestrooms or (ii) earned gross receipts in 2019 exceeding $5,000,000; provided, that a hotel 9 employer shall include the owner, operator, manager or lessee of any restaurant located on hotel 10 premises. 2 of 4 11 “Laid off worker”, an individual employed for hire by an employer in any lawful 12 employment who was employed by the employer for six months or more in the 12 months 13 preceding March 4, 2020 and whose most recent separation from active employment with the 14 employer occurred on or after March 4, 2020 as a result of a lack of business, a reduction in 15 work force or other economic, non-disciplinary reason. For purposes of this section, a laid off 16 worker shall not include a manager, supervisor or a confidential employee as defined in section 1 17 of chapter 150E. 18 “Length of service”, the total time of an individual’s work for hire by an employer in any 19 lawful employment, including periods of time when the worker was on leave or vacation. 20 (b) In any city or town that accepts this section in the manner provided for in section 4 of 21 chapter 4, an employer shall offer any position that is or becomes available to a laid off worker 22 for which said laid off worker is qualified. The offer shall be sent in writing to the: (1) last 23 known mailing address of the laid off worker, (2) electronic mail address of the laid off worker 24 and (3) phone number of the laid off worker by text message. A laid off worker shall be qualified 25 for an available position if the laid off worker: (1) held the same or a substantially similar 26 position at the same employment site at the time of the laid off worker’s most recent separation 27 from active service with the employer; or (2) is or can become qualified for the position through 28 the same training that would be provided to a new worker hired for that position. If more than 1 29 laid off worker is entitled to preference for a position, first priority shall be for a laid off worker 30 with the greatest length of service in the same or a similar position and then for a laid off worker 31 with the greatest length of service at the employment site. 3 of 4 32 (c) A laid off worker offered a position pursuant to this section shall be given no less than 33 5 business days in which to accept or decline the offer. An employer may make simultaneous, 34 conditional offers of employment to laid off workers, with final
View Massachusetts H 1956 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.