New York A 1090: Relates to the creation of crime database of all convictions of animal cruelty

Bill Text

Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

 Skip to main content 

 New York State Assembly

 Speaker Carl E. Heastie

 --> 
 --> 

 --> 

• 
 Assembly Members 

• 
 Legislative Info 

• 
 Public Hearings 

• 
 Speaker's Press 

• 
 Assembly Reports 

• 
 Committees & More 

• Bill Search Home
• Laws
• Legislative Calendar
• Public Hearing Schedule
• Assembly Calendars
• Assembly Committee Agenda 

 Javascript must be enabled to properly view this page. 

 Bill No.: 

• Summary 
• Actions 
• Committee&nbspVotes 
• Floor&nbspVotes 
• Memo 
• Text 
• LFIN 
• Chamber&nbspVideo/Transcript 
A01090 Summary:

BILL NOA01090 

&nbsp

SAME ASNo Same As

&nbsp

SPONSORKim

&nbsp

COSPNSRSteck, Forrest

&nbsp

MLTSPNSR

&nbsp

Add Art 17 §250, St Fin L

&nbsp

Establishes an interstate compact agreement to phase out corporate giveaways which prohibits member states from offering or providing any company-specific tax incentive or company-specific grant to any entity for a corporate headquarters, manufacturing facility, office space or other real estate development located in any other member state as an inducement for the corporate headquarters, manufacturing facility, office space or other real estate development to relocate to the offering member state.

Go to top A01090 Actions:

BILL NOA01090 

&nbsp

01/08/2025referred to economic development

01/07/2026referred to economic development

Go to topA01090 Committee&nbspVotes:

Go to topA01090 Floor&nbspVotes:

There are no Assembly votes for this bill in this legislative session.

Go to topA01090 Text:

 STATE OF NEW YORK
 ________________________________________________________________________

 1090

 2025-2026 Regular Sessions

 IN ASSEMBLY

 January 8, 2025
 ___________

 Introduced by M. of A. KIM, STECK, FORREST -- read once and referred to
 the Committee on Economic Development

 AN ACT to amend the state finance law, in relation to establishing an
 interstate compact agreement to phase out corporate giveaways

 The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
 bly, do enact as follows:

 1 Section 1. The state finance law is amended by adding a new article 17
 2 to read as follows:
 3 ARTICLE 17
 4 INTERSTATE COMPACT AGREEMENT TO PHASE OUT CORPORATE
 5 GIVEAWAYS
 6 Section 250. Interstate compact agreement to phase out corporate give-
 7 aways.
 8 § 250. Interstate compact agreement to phase out corporate giveaways.
 9 This act shall be known and may be cited as the "agreement to phase out
 10 corporate giveaways act".
 11 Article 1. Membership. Any state of the United States and the District
 12 of Columbia may become a member of this compact by enacting this agree-
 13 ment in substantially the following form.
 14 Article 2. Definitions. As used in this compact, unless the context
 15 clearly indicates otherwise, the following terms shall have the follow-
 16 ing meanings:
 17 a. "Corporate giveaway" means any company-specific or industry-specif-
 18 ic disbursement of funds via property, cash or deferred or reduced tax
 19 liability by a state or local government to a particular company or
 20 industry.
 21 b. "Member state" means any state or the District of Columbia that has
 22 enacted a statute agreeing to this compact.
 23 c. "Company-specific tax incentive" is any change in the general tax
 24 rate or valuation offered or presented to a specific company that is not
 25 available to other similarly-situated companies.

 EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
 [ ] is old law to be omitted.
 LBD00900-01-5

 A. 1090 2

 1 d. "Company-specific grant" is any disbursement of funds via property,
 2 cash or deferred tax liability by the state or local government to a
 3 particular company.
 4 e. "Located in any other member state" means any corporate headquar-
 5 ters, office space, manufacturing facility or other real estate develop-
 6 ment that is physically located in another member state, whether or not
 7 the company has other property in the member state.
 8 Article 3. Findings. The member states find that:
 9 a. Corporate giveaways are among the least effective uses of taxpayer
 10 dollars to create and maintain jobs;
 11 b. Local and state leaders are in a prisoners' dilemma where it is
 12 best for all to create a level playing field for all employers without
 13 any corporate giveaways, but each level of government has an incentive
 14 to subsidize a company, generating a race to the bottom;
 15 c. Governments should attract and retain companies based on general
 16 conditions (including but not limited to modern infrastructure, an
 17 educated workforce, a clean environment, and a favorable tax and regula-
 18 tory climate), not based on a specific grant for a particular company;
 19 d. Corporate giveaways fuel business inequality as only the largest
 20 businesses receive the vast majority of these funds;
 21 e. A reasonable first st