New York A 1338: Provides for local governing board approval of any policies and procedures regarding the public use of public space

Bill Text

Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

 Skip to main content 

 New York State Assembly

 Speaker Carl E. Heastie

 --> 
 --> 

 --> 

• 
 Assembly Members 

• 
 Legislative Info 

• 
 Public Hearings 

• 
 Speaker's Press 

• 
 Assembly Reports 

• 
 Committees & More 

• Bill Search Home
• Laws
• Legislative Calendar
• Public Hearing Schedule
• Assembly Calendars
• Assembly Committee Agenda 

 Javascript must be enabled to properly view this page. 

 Bill No.: 

• Summary 
• Actions 
• Committee&nbspVotes 
• Floor&nbspVotes 
• Memo 
• Text 
• LFIN 
• Chamber&nbspVideo/Transcript 
A01338 Summary:

BILL NOA01338 

&nbsp

SAME ASNo Same As

&nbsp

SPONSORVanel (MS)

&nbsp

COSPNSRBlumencranz, Hyndman, Glick, Schiavoni

&nbsp

MLTSPNSRLevenberg

&nbsp

Add §60.80, CP L; add §4552, CPLR

&nbsp

Sets rules and procedures for the admissibility of evidence created or processed by artificial intelligence.

Go to top A01338 Actions:

BILL NOA01338 

&nbsp

01/09/2025referred to codes

01/07/2026referred to codes

Go to topA01338 Committee&nbspVotes:

Go to topA01338 Floor&nbspVotes:

There are no Assembly votes for this bill in this legislative session.

Go to topA01338 Text:

 STATE OF NEW YORK
 ________________________________________________________________________

 1338

 2025-2026 Regular Sessions

 IN ASSEMBLY

 January 9, 2025
 ___________

 Introduced by M. of A. VANEL, BLUMENCRANZ, HYNDMAN, GLICK -- Multi-Spon-
 sored by -- M. of A. LEVENBERG -- read once and referred to the
 Committee on Codes

 AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law and the civil practice law
 and rules, in relation to the admissibility of evidence created or
 processed by artificial intelligence

 The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
 bly, do enact as follows:

 1 Section 1. The criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new
 2 section 60.80 to read as follows:
 3 § 60.80 Rules of evidence; admissibility of evidence created or proc-
 4 essed by artificial intelligence.
 5 1. Evidence created, in whole or in part, by artificial intelligence
 6 shall not be received into evidence in a criminal proceeding unless the
 7 evidence is substantially supported by independent and admissible
 8 evidence and the proponent of the evidence establishes the reliability
 9 and accuracy of the specific use of the artificial intelligence in
 10 creating the evidence.
 11 2. Evidence processed, in whole or in part, by artificial intelligence
 12 shall not be received into evidence in a criminal proceeding unless the
 13 proponent of the evidence establishes the reliability and accuracy of
 14 the specific use of the artificial intelligence in processing the
 15 evidence.
 16 3. Evidence is created, in whole or in part, by artificial intelli-
 17 gence where the artificial intelligence produces new information from
 18 existing information not present in or reasonably deducible from the
 19 existing information.
 20 4. Evidence is processed, in whole or in part, by artificial intelli-
 21 gence where the artificial intelligence produces a conclusion based off
 22 of its analysis, interpretation, or transformation of existing informa-

 EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
 [ ] is old law to be omitted.
 LBD04106-01-5

 A. 1338 2

 1 tion where such conclusion is not reasonably deducible from the existing
 2 information.
 3 5. Evidence is not reasonably deducible from the existing information
 4 where the reliability or accuracy of the information created or conclu-
 5 sion drawn from the existing information would be substantially compro-
 6 mised without the use of artificial intelligence as a result of the
 7 complexity, uncertainty, or subtlety of the information.
 8 6. Evidence is substantially supported by independent and admissible
 9 evidence where:
 10 (a) The independent evidence is separate from, and not derived from,
 11 the artificial intelligence that generated the artificially created
 12 evidence;
 13 (b) The independent evidence is admissible under the existing rules of
 14 evidence;
 15 (c) The independent evidence bears a close and significant relation-
 16 ship to the artificially created evidence in such a manner that it rein-
 17 forces or corroborates the information created from the artificially
 18 created evidence.
 19 7. The reliability and accuracy of the specific use of the artificial
 20 intelligence in creating or processing the evidence is sufficient where
 21 the proponent of the evidence has a qualified expert testify and such
 22 testimony is sufficient to prove that:
 23 (a) The specific use of the artificial intelligence has been validated
 24 through rigorous scientific or technical testing, demonstrating that it
 25 consistently produces accurate and reliable results in varied environ-
 26 ments;
 27 (b) The artificial intelligence has been subjected to testing or
 28 applica