North Carolina HB 129: Judge Joe John Nonpartisan Judicial Elections Act.
Status: Passed 1st Reading (as of 2025-02-18)
State: North Carolina · Session: 2025 · Bill: HB 129
Subjects: BOARDS; CAMPAIGN FINANCE; COURT OF APPEALS; COURTS; DISTRICT COURT; ELECTIONS; ELECTIONS, STATE BOARD OF; FEES; FUNDS & ACCOUNTS; JUDGES; POLITICAL PARTIES; PUBLIC; PUBLIC OFFICIALS; SESSION LAWS; SUPREME COURT; SUPERIOR COURT; PRIMARIES; BALLOTS & BALLOT ISSUES; VACANCIES
Sponsors: A. Jones, Morey, Rubin, Ager, Baker, Ball, Belk, Buansi, Budd, Butler, Carney, Cervania, Clark, Cohn, Crawford, F. Jackson, G. Brown, G. Pierce, Harrison, Hawkins, Helfrich, Johnson-Hostler, K. Brown, Liu, Logan
Bill Text
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2025 H 1 HOUSE BILL 129 Short Title: Judge Joe John Nonpartisan Jud. Elections Act. (Public) Sponsors: Representatives Morey, Rubin, A. Jones, and Longest (Primary Sponsors). For a complete list of sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly web site. Referred to: Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House February 18, 2025 *H129-v-1* A BILL TO BE ENTITLED 1 AN ACT TO REENACT NONPARTISAN JUDICIAL ELECTIONS, TO MAKE 2 CONFORMING STATUTORY CHANGES RELATING TO REENACTMENT OF 3 NONPARTISAN JUDICIAL ELECTIONS, AND TO REESTABLISH PUBLIC 4 FINANCING FOR JUDICIAL CAMPAIGNS. 5 Whereas, Representative and former Court of Appeals Judge Joseph Robert (Joe) 6 John was a lifelong public servant and champion of an independent judiciary; and 7 Whereas, Judge John served the people of North Carolina at the highest levels in all 8 three branches of State government; and 9 Whereas, Judge John's broad experience informed his deep understanding of the 10 genius of the separation of powers; and 11 Whereas, Judge John was a man of integrity who understood the importance of a 12 judiciary free from fear or favor; and 13 Whereas, Judge John never wavered in his belief in the central role of a nonpartisan 14 judiciary in upholding our democracy; and 15 Whereas, his experience and values compelled Judge John to introduce a bill each 16 legislative session of his four terms to return North Carolina to the nonpartisan election of judges; 17 and 18 Whereas, the need to restore public confidence in an independent judiciary has never 19 been more urgent; Now, therefore, 20 The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: 21 22 PART I. REENACT NONPARTISAN JUDICIAL ELECTIONS 23 SECTION 1.1. Chapter 163 of the General Statutes is amended by adding a new 24 Subchapter to read: 25 "SUBCHAPTER XI. ELECTION OF APPELLATE, SUPERIOR, AND DISTRICT 26 COURT JUDGES. 27 "Article 26. 28 "Nomination and Election of Appellate, Superior, and District Court Judges. 29 "§ 163-350. Applicability. 30 The nomination and election of justices of the Supreme Court, judges of the Court of Appeals, 31 and superior and district court judges of the General Court of Justice shall be as provided by this 32 Article. 33 "§ 163-351. Nonpartisan primary election method. 34 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 Page 2 House Bill 129-First Edition (a) General. – Except as provided in G.S. 163-358, there shall be a primary to narrow the 1 field of candidates to two candidates for each position to be filled if, when the filing period closes, 2 there are more than two candidates for a single office or the number of candidates for a group of 3 offices exceeds twice the number of positions to be filled. If only one or two candidates file for 4 a single office, no primary shall be held for that office, and the candidates shall be declared 5 nominated. If the number of candidates for a group of offices does not exceed twice the number 6 of positions to be filled, no primary shall be held for those offices, and the candidates shall be 7 declared nominated. 8 (b) Determination of Nominees. – In the primary, the two candidates for a single office 9 receiving the highest number of votes, and those candidates for a group of offices receiving the 10 highest number of votes, equal to twice the number of positions to be filled shall be declared 11 nominated. If two or more candidates receiving the highest number of votes each receive the 12 same number of votes, the State Board shall determine their relative ranking by lot and shall 13 declare the nominees accordingly. The canvass of the primary shall be held on the same date as 14 the primary canvass fixed under G.S. 163-182.5. The canvass shall be conducted in accordance 15 with Article 15A of this Chapter. 16 (c) Determination of Election Winners. – In the election, the names of those candidates 17 declared nominated without a primary and those candidates nominated in the primary shall be 18 placed on the ballot. The candidate for a single office receiving the highest number of votes shall 19 be elected. Those candidates for a group of offices receiving the highest number of votes, equal 20 in number to the number of positions to be filled, shall be elected. If two candidates receiving the 21 highest number of votes each received the same number of votes, the State Board shall determine 22 the winner by lot. 23 "§ 163-352. Notice of candidacy. 24 (a) Form of Notice. – Each person offering to be a candidate for election shall do so by 25 filing a notice of candidacy with the State Board in the following form, inserting the words in 26 parentheses when appropriate: 27 28 Date: _______________________________ 29 30 I hereby file notice that I am a candidate for election to the office of __________ in the 31 regular election to be held _____________, ____. 32 33 Signed: _____________________________ 34 (Name of Candidate) 35 36 Witness: ________________________________________
View North Carolina HB 129 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.