South Carolina S 51: Judges, Magistrates, and Solicitors salaries
Status: Scrivener's error corrected (as of 2023-07-27)
State: South Carolina · Session: 2023-2024 · Bill: S 51
Sponsors: Malloy
Bill Text
2025-2026 Bill 51 Text of Previous Version (Apr. 30, 2025) - South Carolina Legislature Online South Carolina General Assembly 126th Session, 2025-2026 Bill 51 Indicates Matter Stricken Indicates New Matter (Text matches printed bills. Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.) Committee Report April 30, 2025 S. 51 Introduced by Senators Davis, Grooms, Stubbs, Massey, Garrett, Sutton, Turner, Graham, Gambrell, Zell, Johnson, Rice, Campsen, Sabb, Fernandez, Leber, Devine, Climer, Cromer, Hutto, Young, Kimbrell, Matthews, Jackson, Blackmon, Adams, Hembree, Corbin, Williams, Goldfinch, Bennett, Reichenbach, Elliott, Chaplin, Verdin, Kennedy, Alexander and Walker S. Printed 4/30/25--H. Read the first time March 4, 2025 ________ The committee on House Labor, Commerce and Industry To whom was referred a Joint Resolution (S. 51) to encourage Santee Cooper to issue a request for proposal to solicit proposals on utilizing assets associated with V.C. Summer Units 2 and 3, and for considerations, etc., respectfully Report: That they have duly and carefully considered the same, and recommend that the same do pass: WILLIAM HERBKERSMAN for Committee. statement of estimated fiscal impact Explanation of Fiscal Impact State Expenditure This joint resolution encourages PSA to issue an RFP in order to solicit proposals from entities that are interested in utilizing assets associated with V.C. Summer Units 2 and 3. The resolution also encourages PSA to share information needed to make a proposal, including data vaults related to the project as well as legal and equitable ownership interests in the associated real and personal property, with the entities involved in the RFP process. The resolution further encourages PSA to consider each bidder's proposal related to the construction of Units 2 and 3 or other assets associated with Units 2 and 3 as well as the economic impact each proposal will have on South Carolinians, including potential relief for ratepayers. Finally, the resolution requires JBRC to approve, reject, or modify any RFP that involves the transfer of interest in real property by PSA before the agency pursues a proposal. PSA indicates that there will be additional costs related to development and administration of the RFP and final review of the proposal but is unable to quantify those costs at this time. However, PSA anticipates being able to manage the costs within their existing budget. Frank A. Rainwater, Executive Director Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office _______ A joint Resolution TO ENCOURAGE SANTEE COOPER TO ISSUE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS ON UTILIZING ASSETS ASSOCIATED WITH V.C. SUMMER UNITS 2 AND 3, AND FOR CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. Amend Title To Conform Whereas, in 2008, the South Carolina Public Service Authority (Santee Cooper) and the South Carolina Energy and Gas Company (SCE&G) applied for combined licenses for two AP1000 nuclear reactors, referred to as Units 2 and 3, to be built at the V.C. Summer Nuclear Station site in Fairfield County; and Whereas, Santee Cooper and SCE&G began construction of Units 2 and 3, but the construction was abandoned in July 2017 and the combined licenses were subsequently terminated in July 2019; and Whereas, in July 2019, there had not been an AP1000 nuclear unit constructed in the United States; however, in 2023 and 2024, two AP1000 nuclear units were completed and became operational at the Vogtle Electric Generation Plant in Georgia, and in addition, four AP1000 nuclear units have been completed and became operational in China; and Whereas, the successful completion of these nuclear units in Georgia and China show that the AP1000 technology is capable of providing carbon-neutral baseload electricity on a large scale, and has effectuated proficiency in completing and operating a AP1000 unit and also established an experienced workforce with unique knowledge and skill set regarding this technology; and Whereas, nuclear-generation technology of varying designs and capacities are currently in development, construction, and operation in the United States, and by way of example, the AP1000 is the only gigawatt-scale Generation III+ light water reactor currently constructed and operational in the United States, and the design has overcome the "first-of-a-kind" challenges that contributed to delays and issues with the V.C. Summer Units 2 and 3 projects and ultimately contributed to the decision by Santee Cooper and SCE&G to abandon the projects in July 2017; and Whereas, the lessons learned from the completed construction of Vogtle Units 3 and 4, as well as the four AP1000 reactors in China, have led to significant design improvements, and the updated design minimizes the need for major changes, apart from site-specific adaptations, and to significant insights into cost and project management to deliver the
View South Carolina S 51 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.