South Carolina H 4339: A HOUSE RESOLUTION TO CONGRATULATE LIEUTENANT COLONEL JAMES "JIMMY" BROWNLEE UPON THE OCCASION OF HIS RETIREMENT, TO SALUTE HIM FOR HIS TWENTY-FOUR YEARS OF SERVICE AND TO EXTEND BEST WISHES FOR CONTINUED SUCCESS AND FULFILLMENT IN THE YEARS TO COME.
Status: Scrivener's error corrected (as of 2017-07-07)
State: South Carolina · Session: 2017-2018 · Bill: H 4339
Sponsors: Alexander, Allison, Anderson, Anthony, Arrington, Atkinson, Atwater, B. Newton, Bales, Ballentine, Bamberg, Bannister, Bedingfield, Bennett, Bernstein, Blackwell, Bowers, Bradley, Brown, Burns, Caskey, Chumley, Clary, Clemmons, Clyburn
Bill Text
2025-2026 Bill 4339 Text of Previous Version (May. 06, 2025) - South Carolina Legislature Online South Carolina General Assembly 126th Session, 2025-2026 Bill 4339 Indicates Matter Stricken Indicates New Matter (Text matches printed bills. Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.) Amended May 6, 2025 H. 4339 Introduced by Reps. Erickson, Terribile, Bradley, Martin, Huff, Mitchell, Forrest, Anderson, Duncan, Kilmartin, Lawson, Hager, M. M. Smith, Beach, Frank, J. L. Johnson, Gilliam, Rankin, Bauer, Teeple, Pedalino, McCabe, Bustos, Wickensimer, Cobb-Hunter, Vaughan, Haddon, Willis, Long, Chapman, Pace, Caskey, Chumley, Whitmire, Morgan, Magnuson, Gibson, Davis, Edgerton, Hartz, Bernstein, Harris, B. Newton, Hewitt, Waters, Luck, Rivers, Hartnett, B. L. Cox, Reese, Taylor, Bowers, Gagnon, Herbkersman, Jordan, McGinnis, Moss, Spann-Wilder, Weeks, Gilreath, Cromer, Guffey and Pope S. Printed 5/6/25--H. Read the first time April 9, 2025 ________ statement of estimated fiscal impact Explanation of Fiscal Impact State Expenditure This bill, as amended, prohibits any public school, excluding charter schools, participating in a federally funded or assisted meal program from serving or allowing a third party to sell ultraprocessed food to students on school premises during the regular instructional day beginning July 1, 2027. The bill requires each public school to annually submit a standardized certification form to SCDE's Office of School Nutrition attesting its compliance with the provisions of the bill. SCDE must post the certification form and a list of compliant schools on its website and conduct random audits of school meal samples every two years to verify compliance, using third-party laboratory testing if necessary. If a prohibited additive is found, the school and supplier will receive a warning from SCDE and will have sixty calendar days to correct the violation. The school or district personnel responsible for procuring food served to students for school breakfast and lunch during the instructional day must undergo training from SCDE regarding the purchase and procurement of food allowed under the provisions of the bill. A second violation incurs a fine of up to $5,000 per supplier. The fine must be paid to the school and used for the purpose of improving or establishing a vegetable garden on school grounds. A third violation may disqualify the supplier from providing school meals for one fiscal year. Each violation must be reported by the school to its respective school district immediately upon notice of a violation. Every five years, SCDE, in consultation with the Department of Agriculture, must review scientific evidence and international regulations to determine if additional additives should be prohibited. SCDE must oversee implementation and ensure compliance with the provisions of the bill, as amended, as well as issue a model policy and promulgate regulations as necessary. S.C. Department of Education. SCDE indicates that this bill, as amended, will increase expenses by an amount up to $93,750 per year beginning in FY 2025-26. Of this amount, $78,750 is for 1.0 FTE (registered dietitian) including annual salary and fringe benefits, and $15,000 is for training and travel. SCDE will request a General Fund appropriation increase to cover the cost of the new FTE and training and travel expenses. Department of Agriculture. The expenditure impact of this bill, as amended, on the Department of Agriculture is undetermined at this time. The Department of Agriculture indicates that depending upon the workload and what SCDE requests their consultation on, the department may need to hire scientists or legal consultants who specialize in food additive ingredients to assist in reviewing scientific evidence and international regulations and providing guidance. State Agency Schools. The overall expenditure impact of this bill, as amended, on state agency schools will vary. The Governor's School for Agriculture at John de la Howe indicates that the agency will have to work with its food vendor to ensure the products purchased do not have additives. The agency anticipates this will make purchasing food more costly but reports the cost is currently undetermined. GSAH does not anticipate any fiscal impact. However, GSAH indicates that prohibiting the use of food additives in school meals will require a state contract change with its food vendor, which does not expire for three more years, as well as an addendum to the contract. GSSM reports that compliance with the proposed legislation will require a custom contract modification to eliminate foods with the prohibited additives. GSSM further reports that based on a preliminary estimate, ingredient costs will increase by approximately 15 percent, which will directly affect the overall cost of the school's meal plan and increase expenses by an amount up to $1
View South Carolina H 4339 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.