Massachusetts H 1658: An Act to enhance fairness and increase positive outcomes for children
Status: Accompanied a study order, see H5281 (under House Rule 27) (as of 2026-03-26)
State: Massachusetts · Session: 194th · Bill: H 1658
Sponsors: Marjorie C. Decker, Amy Mah Sangiolo, Estela A. Reyes, James B. Eldridge, Natalie M. Higgins
Bill Text
1 of 1 HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 3240 FILED ON: 1/16/2025 HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 1658 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts _________________ PRESENTED BY: Marjorie C. Decker _________________ To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General Court assembled: The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill: An Act to enhance fairness and increase positive outcomes for children. _______________ PETITION OF: NAME: DISTRICT/ADDRESS: DATE ADDED: Marjorie C. Decker 25th Middlesex 1/16/2025 Estela A. Reyes 4th Essex 5/28/2025 Natalie M. Higgins 4th Worcester 6/11/2025 James B. Eldridge Middlesex and Worcester 6/13/2025 Amy Mah Sangiolo 11th Middlesex 7/9/2025 1 of 3 HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 3240 FILED ON: 1/16/2025 HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 1658 By Representative Decker of Cambridge, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1658) of Marjorie C. Decker relative to the use of electronic monitoring of juveniles. The Judiciary. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts _______________ In the One Hundred and Ninety-Fourth General Court (2025-2026) _______________ An Act to enhance fairness and increase positive outcomes for children. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 Section 1. Chapter 119 of the General Laws is hereby amended by inserting after section 2 58B the following section:- 3 Section 58C Global positioning system device worn by juveniles 4 (a) If electronic monitoring is ordered by a judge for a period greater than 30 days, the 5 court shall hold a hearing every 30 days, unless waived by the juvenile, to ensure that the 6 juvenile does not remain on electronic monitoring for an unreasonable length of time. In 7 determining whether a length of time is unreasonable, the court shall consider whether there are 8 less restrictive conditions that would achieve the purpose of the bail statute and the rehabilitative 9 purpose of the juvenile court. If less restrictive conditions are warranted, the court shall order 10 removal of the global positioning system device or modify the terms of the electronic monitoring 11 order to achieve the less restrictive alternative. 2 of 3 12 (b) A juvenile shall be entitled to have one day credited against the juvenile’s maximum 13 term of confinement for each day, or fraction thereof, that the juvenile is subject to electronic 14 monitoring by court order to wear a global positioning system device, or any comparable device. 15 (c) The juvenile court department shall collect data regarding the use of electronic 16 monitoring of juveniles and shall report statistical data annually by December 31st to the 17 governor, the house and senate chairs of the joint committee on the judiciary, the house and 18 senate chairs of the joint committee on public safety and homeland security, the house and senate 19 chairs of the committee on children, families and persons with disabilities, the chief justice of the 20 supreme judicial court and the chief justice of the trial court. The report, which shall be made 21 public pursuant to reporting recommendations of the Juvenile Justice Policy and Data Board as 22 required by section 89 of chapter 119, shall include the annual number of juveniles subject to 23 electronic monitoring, including all of the following information for each juvenile: 24 (1) The total number of days in a calendar year that the juvenile was subject to electronic 25 monitoring. 26 (2) The total number of days in a calendar year that the juvenile was detained for a 27 violation of a term of the juvenile’s electronic monitoring order not amounting to a new violation 28 of law. 29 (3) The categorical reason the juvenile placed on electronic monitoring: 30 (i) A new violation of law; 31 (ii) A violation of a court order not amounting to a new violation of law; or 32 (iii) A reason not covered by subparagraph (i) or (ii). 3 of 3 33 (4) The case status of the juvenile (indicating whether the youth is placed on electric 34 monitoring pretrial or post adjudication. 35 (5) Whether the juvenile’s electronic monitoring order included a home confinement 36 order, exclusionary zones, or any other restrictions limiting the juvenile’s liberty to a time or 37 place. 38 (6) All of the information described in paragraphs (1) to (5), inclusive, shall be provided 39 in such a way as to allow cross tabulated analysis by demographic subgroups including, at a 40 minimum, age at the time of offense, sex/gender, gender identity and expression, racial or 41 ethnicity category, sexual orientation, charge type and level, geographic location such as county 42 or court location, with consideration of the juveniles’ self-reporting of such categories based on 43 data reporting standards issued by the Juvenile Justice Policy and Data Board as required by 44 section 89 of chapter 119. cro
View Massachusetts H 1658 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.