Minnesota SF 3916: Electronic visit verification provision modifications

Status: Withdrawn and re-referred to Human Services Reform Finance and Policy (as of 2018-04-16)
State: Minnesota · Session: 2017-2018 · Bill: SF 3916
Subjects: Health and Health Department, Human Services and Human Services Department, Telecommunications, Computers, and Information Technology
Sponsors: Abeler
Bill Text

1.1 A bill for an act
1.2 relating to natural resources; protecting wild rice by requiring a wild rice risk
1.3 justification before authorizing certain activities; proposing coding for new law
1.4 in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 84.
1.5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
1.6 Section 1. [84.0912] PROTECTING WILD RICE.
1.7 Subdivision 1.Findings.The legislature finds that uncultivated wild rice:
1.8 (1) is a nutrient-rich, natural food source that has been sustainably harvested in this state
1.9 for centuries;
1.10 (2) is sacred to many Indigenous people and is a core component of their cultural identity;
1.11 (3) thrives in clean, shallow water, without requiring pesticides, fertilizers, or harmful
1.12 chemicals;
1.13 (4) supports rural economies by providing jobs, fostering local businesses, and supporting
1.14 ecotourism;
1.15 (5) plays a crucial role in preventing toxic algae blooms, absorbing carbon dioxide,
1.16 fostering vital habitat for fish, and stabilizing lake beds; and
1.17 (6) is essential for safeguarding Tribal food security and upholding Tribal treaty rights.
1.18 Subd. 2.Definitions.(a) For purposes of this section, the following terms have the
1.19 meanings given.
1Section 1.
26-07123 as introduced02/17/26 REVISOR CKM/CG
SENATE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
S.F. No. 3916NINETY-FOURTH SESSION
(SENATE AUTHORS: KUNESH)
OFFICIAL STATUSD-PGDATE
Introduction and first reading640502/26/2026
Referred to Environment, Climate, and Legacy

2.1 (b) "Agency" means a department, agency, board, commission, or other group in the
2.2 executive branch of state government; a statutory or home rule charter city, county, or town;
2.3 any metropolitan agency or regional entity; and any other political subdivision of the state.
2.4 (c) "Wild rice risk justification" means a document that quantifies and justifies the
2.5 potential risk of adverse effects to wild rice waters and that meets the requirements of
2.6 subdivision 4.
2.7 (d) "Wild rice water" means any body of water:
2.8 (1) identified as supporting, or capable of supporting, wild rice on any list, inventory,
2.9 or map maintained by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency or the Department of Natural
2.10 Resources;
2.11 (2) that lies within, or abuts and flows into, Indian country, as that term is defined in
2.12 United States Code, title 18, section 1151; or
2.13 (3) identified using the appropriation in Laws 2025, First Special Session chapter 1,
2.14 article 2, section 2, subdivision 3, paragraph (z), as a water in which uncultivated wild rice
2.15 grows.
2.16 Subd. 3.Authorizing activities affecting wild rice.Notwithstanding any other provision
2.17 of law, an agency may not issue a permit, license, or other approval for an activity or facility
2.18 in a wild rice water, or at a location likely to adversely affect a wild rice water, unless the
2.19 agency prepares a wild rice risk justification that meets the requirements of subdivision 4.
2.20 Subd. 4.Wild rice risk justification requirements.A wild rice risk justification must
2.21 include at least the following:
2.22 (1) identification and a detailed description of all wild rice waters potentially threatened
2.23 by the activity or facility proposed to be permitted, licensed, or approved;
2.24 (2) identification of all scenarios that might pose a risk to the wild rice waters identified
2.25 under clause (1), the likelihood of each scenario unfolding, and the scale of damage to wild
2.26 rice waters that would likely result from each scenario; and
2.27 (3) an explanation of how the public need for the proposed activity or facility justifies
2.28 the risk posed by the activity or facility to wild rice waters.
2.29 Subd. 5.Public comment and review; Tribal consultation; posting.(a) The agency
2.30 must provide a draft wild rice risk justification for public comment. The agency must accept
2.31 comments for at least 30 days. Before issuing a final decision on the permit, license, or
2.32 other approval, the agency must respond in writing to all substantive comments. If 100 or
2Section 1.
26-07123 as introduced02/17/26 REVISOR CKM/CG

3.1 more residents or property owners in the state of Minnesota request a public hearing in
3.2 writing during the comment period, the agency must hold a public hearing near the affected
3.3 wild rice water.
3.4 (b) The agency must also provide a copy of the draft wild rice risk justification to
3.5 Minnesota Tribal governments, as defined under section 10.65, and must engage in section
3.6 10.65 consultation concerning the draft wild rice risk justification with any Minnesota Tribal
3.7 government that requests it.
3.8 (c) The agency must publish a final wild rice risk justification in the State Register and
3.9 post it on the agency's website. The publication of the final wild rice risk justification in the
3.10 State Register constitutes issuance of a final wild rice risk ju
View Minnesota SF 3916 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.