South Carolina S 46: Separate confinement of juvenile offenders
Status: Scrivener's error corrected (as of 2020-03-05)
State: South Carolina · Session: 2019-2020 · Bill: S 46
Sponsors: Malloy
Bill Text
2025-2026 Bill 46 Text of Previous Version (Dec. 11, 2024) - South Carolina Legislature Online South Carolina General Assembly 126th Session, 2025-2026 Bill 46 Indicates Matter Stricken Indicates New Matter (Text matches printed bills. Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.) A bill TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ADDING CHAPTER 9 TO TITLE 41 SO AS TO PROVIDE CERTAIN CONTRACT PROVISIONS THAT INTERFERE WITH THE PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP OR ALLOW FOR THE CORPORATE PRACTICE OF MEDICINE ARE DECLARED TO BE AGAINST PUBLIC POLICY OF THIS STATE, TO PROVIDE CERTAIN CONTRAVENING CONTRACT PROVISIONS ARE UNENFORCEABLE, TO SPECIFY CERTAIN RELATED CONTRACT PROVISIONS WHICH ARE ENFORCEABLE, AND TO PROVIDE REMEDIES FOR VIOLATIONS, AMONG OTHER THINGS. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina: SECTION 1. Title 41 of the S.C. Code is amended by adding: CHAPTER 9 Healthcare Contracts Section 41-9-110. It is hereby declared that contract provisions which interfere with a physician-patient relationship or allow for the corporate practice of medicine are against the public policy of this State. Section 41-9-120. (A) A physician licensed to practice medicine pursuant to the provisions of Title 40, Chapter 47 has a direct, personal, and individual duty and responsibility to his patients, regardless of his form of practice or employment and any contract or agreement that creates or establishes the terms of a partnership, employment, or any other form of professional relationship that restricts or interferes with the physician's ability to treat patients or impermissibly delegates to or allows a corporate entity to fulfill or direct this duty are void and unenforceable with respect to said restriction; provided, however, that nothing herein may be construed to render void or unenforceable the remaining provisions of any such contract or agreement. (B) Impermissible, unenforceable, and void restrictions under subsection (A) include, but are not limited to the following: (1) any restriction on the ability of a physician to practice medicine in any geographic area for any period of time after the termination of such partnership, employment, or professional relationship; (2) any restriction on the ability of a physician to continue to provide treatment, advise, or consult with any current patient after the termination of such partnership, employment, or professional relationship; (3) any restriction on the right of a physician to establish or seek to establish a physician-patient relationship with any patient upon his departure from the partnership, employer, or other entity; (4) any restriction that in any manner, directly or indirectly, supplants, diminishes, directs, or regulates the independent judgment of the physician concerning the practice of medicine or the diagnosis and treatment of any patient; (5) any restriction or provision that either directly or indirectly allows a partnership, hospital, health system, or any other corporate entity, except as provided in Section 33-19-101, et. seq., to practice medicine in violation of Section 40-47-200; and (6) any restriction on the obligation of a physician as determined by the Board of Medical Examiners, including the withholding of information, to notify patients of his departure from such partnership, employment, or professional relationship, at least thirty days before his departure including how the patient can obtain his medical record and whether or not the physician will still be practicing in the State, and how to seek continued treatment from the physician, if the patient chooses. The partnership, employer, or other professional entity may specify in the written contract or agreement that it will undertake this notification on behalf or the physician at least thirty days before his departure, if possible, but no later than thirty days after his departure if the Board of Medical Examiners requires. Such notification to the patient by the entity must be in writing and mailed or e-mailed to the address of record for each patient, must make clear that the choice of a physician belongs to the patient, and must include how the patient can obtain his medical record and how to seek continued treatment from the departing physician, must state whether or not the departing physician will still be practicing in the State, and must be provided to the entity within thirty days of departure. The Board of Medical Examiners must promulgate a regulation that clearly outlines the circumstances in which this notification is required and develop and publish the minimum requirements that will satisfy this notification requirement by the entity. Further, no partnership, employer, or other entity may withhold this information from a patient if the patient inquires before the notification is sent and the entity has been informed by the d
View South Carolina S 46 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.