Iowa SF 350: A bill for an act relating to motor vehicle window tint, and making penalties applicable.
Status: Committee report approving bill, renumbered as SF 491. (as of 2023-03-02)
State: Iowa · Session: 2023-2024 · Bill: SF 350
Subjects: motor vehicles, transportation department, vehicles, windshields
Sponsors: EDLER
Bill Text
Senate File 350 - Introduced SENATE FILE 350 BY GREEN (COMPANION TO HF 438 BY JONES) A BILL FOR An Act concerning persons appointed to a convention called by 1 the United States Congress to propose amendments to the 2 Constitution of the United States, making appropriations, 3 and providing penalties. 4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA: 5 TLSB 1932XS (2) 91 ss/ns S.F. 350 Section 1. LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS. The general assembly 1 finds all of the following: 2 1. Article V of the Constitution of the United States 3 contains two methods for proposing amendments to the 4 Constitution of the United States: 5 a. The proposal of amendments by Congress whenever 6 two-thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary. 7 b. The call of a convention for proposing amendments by 8 Congress upon the application of the legislatures of two-thirds 9 of the several states. 10 2. There have been over four hundred fifty applications 11 for an Article V convention of the states for the purpose of 12 proposing amendments. 13 3. Every state legislature except Hawaii has enacted one 14 or more resolutions calling for an Article V convention of the 15 states for the purpose of proposing amendments. Some states 16 have rescinded some or all of such resolutions. 17 4. Thirty-seven states have current resolutions calling 18 for an Article V convention of the states for the purpose 19 of proposing amendments. These states are: Alabama, 20 Alaska, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, 21 Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, 22 Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, 23 Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, 24 Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South 25 Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West 26 Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. 27 5. Each of these applications have specified topics for 28 such a convention. A very small number have been a call for 29 a general convention. The vast majority of applications have 30 been for a convention to propose amendments on a specified 31 topic. 32 6. No set of applications from the legislatures of the 33 several states has ever reached the threshold of two-thirds of 34 the states applying for a convention for the same topic. 35 -1- LSB 1932XS (2) 91 ss/ns 1/ 14 S.F. 350 7. An unwavering historical precedent has been established 1 for a valid application for an Article V convention of the 2 states for the purpose of proposing amendments, by requiring 3 two-thirds of the legislatures of the several states to apply 4 for a convention for amendments on the same topic or topics. 5 8. The general assembly of Iowa has passed nine resolutions 6 calling for an Article V convention of the states for the 7 purpose of proposing amendments on a variety of topics. Eight 8 of these resolutions are still valid, although three of them 9 are likely moot since the topic therein concerned the direct 10 election of United States senators. 11 9. There are contemporary efforts to call for an Article 12 V convention of the states for the purpose of proposing 13 amendments that have reached more than one-half of the required 14 number of states to require Congress to call such a convention. 15 10. It is in the best interest of the people of Iowa for 16 its general assembly to be prepared to nominate, credential, 17 and oversee the actions of delegates that it will appoint for 18 such a convention regardless of the topic if such convention 19 is called. 20 11. The historic record makes it clear that the founders 21 used the term “convention of states” to describe the Article 22 V convention process. This terminology has at least one 23 particular legal meaning. It clarifies that the convention 24 will be in the form of states meeting as states. By 25 definition, all conventions of states require voting on the 26 basis of one state, one vote. 27 12. All stages of the convention process proceed on the 28 basis of one state, one vote. Two-thirds of the states are 29 required to call a convention. A majority of the states 30 are required to finalize the text of any proposed amendments 31 drafted by the convention. Three-fourths of the states are 32 required, via either their legislature or in ratification 33 conventions as shall be specified by Congress, to ratify the 34 text of any proposed amendment. 35 -2- LSB 1932XS (2) 91 ss/ns 2/ 14 S.F. 350 13. As established at the original constitutional 1 convention in Philadelphia in 1787, the legislature of each 2 state names its commissioners or delegates, and gives them such 3 instructions as the legislature deems appropriate. 4 14. Once two-thirds of the several states have applied for 5 a convention for the same topic, the duty of Congress to call a 6 convention is mandatory. 7 15. Litigation surrounding the ratification of the equal 8 rights am
View Iowa SF 350 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.