North Carolina SB 339: Restore NC Bar Appoint's/Judicial Discipline.
Status: Passed 1st Reading (as of 2025-03-20)
State: North Carolina · Session: 2025 · Bill: SB 339
Subjects: APPOINTMENTS; ATTORNEYS; COMMISSIONS; COURT OF APPEALS; COURTS; ETHICS; JUDGES; JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMN.; LICENSING & CERTIFICATION; MAGISTRATES; MEMBERSHIP; OCCUPATIONS; PUBLIC; STATE BAR; SUPREME COURT
Sponsors: Everitt, Smith
Bill Text
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2025 S 1 SENATE BILL 339 Short Title: Restore NC Bar Appoint's/Judicial Discipline. (Public) Sponsors: Senator Everitt (Primary Sponsor). Referred to: Rules and Operations of the Senate March 20, 2025 *S339-v-1* A BILL TO BE ENTITLED 1 AN ACT TO REINSTATE STATE BAR COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS TO THE JUDICIAL 2 STANDARDS COMMISSION AND TO REINSTATE FORMER PROVISIONS 3 REGARDING DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES FOR JUSTICES AND JUDGES. 4 The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: 5 6 REINSTATE STATE BAR COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS TO THE JUDICIAL 7 STANDARDS COMMISSION 8 SECTION 1.(a) G.S. 7A-375(a) reads as rewritten: 9 "(a) Composition. – The Judicial Standards Commission shall consist of the following 10 residents of North Carolina: 11 ... 12 (4) Four judges members of the State Bar who have actively practiced in the 13 courts of the State for at least 10 years, appointed by the General Assembly in 14 accordance with G.S. 120-121, selected as follows:State Bar Council. 15 a. One district court judge recommended by the President Pro Tempore 16 of the Senate. 17 b. One district court judge recommended by the Speaker of the House of 18 Representatives. 19 c. One superior court judge recommended by the President Pro Tempore 20 of the Senate. 21 d. One superior court judge recommended by the Speaker of the House 22 of Representatives. 23 ...." 24 SECTION 1.(b) This section is effective when it becomes law and shall result in the 25 immediate conclusion of the terms of each of the four members of the Judicial Standards 26 Commission previously appointed by the General Assembly pursuant to G.S. 7A-375(a)(4). 27 These four seats on the Judicial Standards Commission shall then be filled for new terms by the 28 State Bar Council pursuant to G.S. 7A-375(a)(4), as amended by subsection (a) of this section. 29 30 REINSTATE FORMER PROVISIONS REGARDING DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES 31 FOR JUSTICES AND JUDGES 32 SECTION 2.(a) G.S. 7A-374.2 reads as rewritten: 33 "§ 7A-374.2. Definitions. 34 Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section shall apply 35 throughout this Article: 36 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 Page 2 Senate Bill 339-First Edition ... 1 (7) "Public reprimand" means a written action of the Commission issued upon a 2 finding by the Supreme Court, based upon a written recommendation by the 3 Commission that a judge has violated the Code of Judicial Conduct and has 4 engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, but that 5 misconduct is minor. minor and does not warrant a recommendation by the 6 Commission that the judge be disciplined by the Supreme Court. A public 7 reprimand may require that the judge follow a corrective course of action. 8 ...." 9 SECTION 2.(b) G.S. 7A-376 reads as rewritten: 10 "§ 7A-376. Grounds for discipline by Commission; public reprimand, censure, suspension, 11 or removal by the Supreme Court. 12 (a) The Commission, upon a determination that any judge has engaged in conduct that 13 violates the North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct as adopted by the Supreme Court but that 14 is not of such a nature as would warrant a recommendation of public reprimand, censure, 15 suspension, or removal, may issue to the judge a private letter of caution.caution or may issue to 16 the judge a public reprimand. 17 (b) Upon recommendation of the Commission, the Supreme Court may issue a public 18 reprimand, censure, suspend, or remove any judge for willful misconduct in office, willful and 19 persistent failure to perform the judge's duties, habitual intemperance, conviction of a crime 20 involving moral turpitude, or conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the 21 judicial office into disrepute. A judge who is suspended for any of the foregoing reasons shall 22 receive no compensation during the period of that suspension. A judge who is removed for any 23 of the foregoing reasons shall receive no retirement compensation and is disqualified from 24 holding further judicial office. 25 ...." 26 SECTION 2.(c) G.S. 7A-377(a4) is reenacted as it existed immediately before its 27 repeal. 28 SECTION 2.(d) G.S. 7A-377, as amended by subsection (c) of this section, reads as 29 rewritten: 30 "§ 7A-377. Procedures. 31 (a) Any citizen of the State may file a written complaint with the Commission concerning 32 the qualifications or conduct of any justice or judge of the General Court of Justice, and thereupon 33 the Commission shall make such investigation as it deems necessary. The Commission may also 34 make an investigation on its own motion. The Commission shall not make an investigation, 35 whether initiated upon its own motion or by written complaint of a citizen of this State, when the 36 motion or complaint is based substantially on a legal ruling by a district or superior court judge 37 and the legal ruling has not yet been reviewed and ruled on by either the North Carolina Court of 38 Appeals
View North Carolina SB 339 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.