South Carolina S 940: Product Liability
Status: Referred to Committee on Judiciary (as of 2026-02-19)
State: South Carolina · Session: 2025-2026 · Bill: S 940
Sponsors: Bennett, Blackmon, Climer, Cromer, Elliott, Grooms, Hembree, Massey, Rice, Turner, Verdin
Bill Text
2025-2026 Bill 940 Text of Previous Version (Feb. 19, 2026) - South Carolina Legislature Online South Carolina General Assembly 126th Session, 2025-2026 Bill 940 Indicates Matter Stricken Indicates New Matter (Text matches printed bills. Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.) A bill TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY AMENDING SECTION 15-73-10, RELATING TO THE LIABILITY OF A SELLER FOR SELLING A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT, SO AS TO DEFINE NECESSARY TERMS; AND BY AMENDING SECTION 15-73-30, RELATING TO THE INTENT OF CHAPTER 73 CONCERNING THE LIABILITY OF A SELLER FOR SELLING A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT, SO AS TO PROVIDE LIMITATIONS ON THE LIABILITY OF A DISTRIBUTOR, WHOLESALER, DEALER, RETAILER, OR SELLER OF A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina: SECTION 1. Sections 15-73-10 and 15-73-30 of the S.C. Code are amended to read: Section 15-73-10. (1) One who sells any product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer or to his property is subject to liability for physical harm caused to the ultimate user or consumer, or to his property, ifFor the purposes of this chapter: (1)(a) "Product liability action" means any action brought by a claimant for personal injury, death, or property damage caused by the manufacture, construction, design, formula, preparation, assembly, installation, testing, warnings, instructions, marketing, packaging, or labeling of a manufactured product when the action is based upon: (a)(i) The seller is engaged in the business of selling such a product, andnegligence (b)(ii) It is expected to and does reach the user or consumer without substantial change in the condition in which it is sold.innocent or negligent misrepresentation; (iii) strict product liability doctrine; (iv) the breach of any implied warranty; or (v) the breach of any oral express warranty. (b) A product liability action does not include an action for contribution or indemnity. (2) The rule stated in subsection (1) shall apply although"Distributor" means any distributor, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or seller of a product, or an individual or business entity using a product in the production or delivery of its products or services. (a) The seller has exercised all possible care in the preparation and sale of his product, and (b) The user or consumer has not bought the product from or entered into any contractual relation with the seller. Section 15-73-30. (A) Comments to § 402A of the Restatement of Torts, Second, are incorporated herein by reference thereto as the legislative intent of this chapter.No product liability action may be asserted or may be provided a claim for relief against any distributor, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or seller of a product, or an individual or business entity using a product in the production or delivery of its products or services unless: (1) the distributor, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or seller of a product, or an individual or business entity using a product in the production or delivery of its products or services is also the manufacturer or assembler of the final product and the act of manufacturing or assembling the final product is causally related to the product's defective condition; or (2) the distributor, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or seller of a product, or an individual or business entity using a product in the production or delivery of its products or services altered or modified the product, and the alteration or modification of the product was a substantial factor in causing the harm for which recovery of damages is sought. (B) Notwithstanding the provisions contained in subsection (A), if a claimant is unable to identify the manufacturer of an allegedly defective and unreasonably dangerous product following a good faith exercise of due diligence, then a product liability action may be brought against a distributor, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or seller of a product, or an individual or business entity using a product in the production or delivery of its products or services. The claimant shall provide an affidavit certifying that the claimant, or his legal counsel, has in good faith exercised due diligence but has been unable to identify the manufacturer of the allegedly defective and unreasonably dangerous product. (C) In a product liability action brought pursuant to subsection (B) against a distributor, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or seller of a product, or an individual or business entity using a product in the production or delivery of its products or services, the distributor, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or seller of a product, or an individual or business entity using a product in the production or delivery of its products or services, upon answering the complaint or otherwise pleading, may file an affidavit certifying the correct identity of the manufact
View South Carolina S 940 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.