Connecticut HB 5280: AN ACT CONCERNING ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES TO ELECTIONS.
Status: PUBLIC HEARING 0228 (as of 2020-02-24)
State: Connecticut · Session: 2020 · Bill: HB 5280
Subjects: Age, Candidates, Elections, Petitions, Political parties
Sponsors: Government Administration And Elections Committee
Bill Text
LCO 1 of 4 General Assembly Substitute Bill No. 5280 February Session, 2026 AN ACT CONCERNING A NONCHARGE FOR EMPLOYEES PAID BENEFITS THROUGH THE SHARED WORK PROGRAM DURING PERIODS OF HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened: Section 1. Subsection (c) of section 31-225a of the 2026 supplement to 1 the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu 2 thereof (Effective October 1, 2026): 3 (c) (1) (A) Any week for which the employer has compensated the 4 claimant in the form of wages in lieu of notice, dismissal payments or 5 any similar payment for loss of wages shall be considered a week of 6 employment for the purpose of determining employer chargeability. 7 (B) No benefits shall be charged to any employer who paid wages of 8 five hundred dollars or less to the claimant in his or her base period. 9 (C) No dependency allowance paid to a claimant shall be charged to 10 any employer. 11 (D) In the event of a natural disaster declared by the President of the 12 United States, no benefits paid on the basis of total or partial 13 unemployment that is the result of physical damage to a place of 14 employment caused by severe weather conditions including, but not 15 limited to, hurricanes, snow storms, ice storms or flooding, or fire except 16 where caused by the employer, shall be charged to any employer. 17 Substitute Bill No. 5280 LCO 2 of 4 (E) If the administrator finds that (i) an individual's most recent 18 separation from a base period employer occurred under conditions that 19 would result in disqualification by reason of subdivision (2), (6) or (9) of 20 subsection (a) of section 31-236, or (ii) an individual was discharged for 21 violating an employer's drug testing policy, provided the policy has 22 been adopted and applied consistent with sections 31-51t to 31-51aa, 23 inclusive, section 14-261b and any applicable federal law, no benefits 24 paid thereafter to such individual with respect to any week of 25 unemployment that is based upon wages paid by such employer with 26 respect to employment prior to such separation shall be charged to such 27 employer's account, provided such employer shall have filed a notice 28 with the administrator within the time allowed for appeal in section 31-29 241. 30 (F) No base period employer's account shall be charged with respect 31 to benefits paid to a claimant if such employer continues to employ such 32 claimant at the time the employer's account would otherwise have been 33 charged to the same extent that he or she employed him or her during 34 the individual's base period, provided the employer shall notify the 35 administrator within the time allowed for appeal in section 31-241. 36 (G) If a claimant has failed to accept suitable employment under the 37 provisions of subdivision (1) of subsection (a) of section 31-236 and the 38 disqualification has been imposed, the account of the employer who 39 makes an offer of employment to a claimant who was a former 40 employee shall not be charged with any benefit payments made to such 41 claimant after such initial offer of reemployment until such time as such 42 claimant resumes employment with such employer, provided such 43 employer shall make application therefor in a form acceptable to the 44 administrator. The administrator shall notify such employer whether or 45 not his or her application is granted. Any decision of the administrator 46 denying suspension of charges as herein provided may be appealed 47 within the time allowed for appeal in section 31-241. 48 (H) Fifty per cent of benefits paid to a claimant under the federal-state 49 extended duration unemployment benefits program established by the 50 Substitute Bill No. 5280 LCO 3 of 4 federal Employment Security Act shall be charged to the experience 51 accounts of the claimant's base period employers in the same manner as 52 the regular benefits paid for such benefit year. 53 (I) No base period employer's account shall be charged with respect 54 to benefits paid to a claimant who voluntarily left suitable work with 55 such employer (i) to care for a seriously ill spouse, parent or child, or (ii) 56 due to the discontinuance of the transportation used by the claimant to 57 get to and from work, as provided in subparagraphs (A)(ii) and (A)(iii) 58 of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 31-236. 59 (J) No base period employer's account shall be charged with respect 60 to benefits paid to a claimant who has been discharged or suspended 61 because the claimant has been disqualified from performing the work 62 for which he or she was hired due to the loss of such claimant's operator 63 license as a result of a drug or alcohol test or testing program conducted 64 in accordance with section 14-44k, 14-227a or 14-227b while the claimant 65 was off duty. 66 (K) No base period employer's account shall be charged with respect 67 to benefits paid to a claimant whos
View Connecticut HB 5280 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.