Montana HB 21: Revising process for adoption of school accreditation standards
Status: Chapter Number Assigned (as of 2023-03-23)
State: Montana · Session: 2023 · Bill: HB 21
Subjects: School Finance, Schools and Education
Sponsors: David Bedey
Bill Text
Amendment - 1st Reading/2nd House-blue - Requested by: Daniel Salomon - (S) Education and Cultural Resources 68th Legislature Drafter: Pad McCracken, 406-444-3595 HB0021.001.002 - 1 - Authorized Print Version – HB 21 HOUSE BILL NO. 21 1 INTRODUCED BY D. BEDEY 2 BY REQUEST OF THE LEGISLATIVE FINANCE COMMITTEE 3 4 A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: “AN ACT REVISING THE PROCESS FOR ADOPTION OF SCHOOL 5 ACCREDITATION STANDARDS; REQUIRING THAT ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENTS FOR CERTAIN 6 ACCREDITATION STANDARDS INCLUDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE TIME REQUIRED FOR 7 IMPLEMENTATION; REASSIGNING THE REVIEW OF ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENTS TO 8 LEGISLATIVE BUDGET COMMITTEES; REQUIRING THE BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUCATION TO REQUEST 9 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION TO SEEK FUNDING FOR STANDARDS DETERMINED 10 DURING THE LEGISLATIVE INTERIM TO REQUIRE SUBSTANTIAL EXPENDITURES; AMENDING 11 SECTION 20-7-101, MCA; AND PROVIDING EFFECTIVE DATES AND A TERMINATION DATE.” 12 13 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA: 14 15 Section 1. Section 20-7-101, MCA, is amended to read: 16 "20-7-101. Standards of accreditation Accreditation standards -- process for adoption. (1) 17 Standards of accreditation (a) Accreditation standards, as defined in 20-1-101, for all schools must be adopted 18 by the board of public education upon the recommendations of the superintendent of public instruction. The 19 superintendent shall develop recommendations in accordance with subsection (2). The For an accreditation 20 standard that requires implementation by school districts, the recommendations presented to the board must 21 include an economic impact statement, as described in 2-4-405, prepared in consultation with the negotiated 22 rulemaking committee under subsection (2). 23 (b) For accreditation standards addressing academic requirements, program area standards, or 24 content and performance standards, the economic impact statement under subsection (1)(a) must include an 25 analysis of the ability of school districts to implement the standard within existing resources, including time. The 26 intent of this subsection (1)(b) is to ensure that school districts have the capacity to adhere to required 27 Amendment - 1st Reading/2nd House-blue - Requested by: Daniel Salomon - (S) Education and Cultural Resources 68th Legislature Drafter: Pad McCracken, 406-444-3595 HB0021.001.002 - 2 - Authorized Print Version – HB 21 accreditation standards within a basic system of free quality public elementary and secondary schools. 1 (2) The accreditation standards recommended by the superintendent of public instruction must be 2 developed through the negotiated rulemaking process under Title 2, chapter 5, part 1. The superintendent may 3 form a negotiated rulemaking committee for accreditation standards to consider multiple proposals. The 4 negotiated rulemaking committee may not exist for longer than 2 years. The committee must represent the 5 diverse circumstances of schools of all sizes across the state and must include representatives from the 6 following groups: 7 (a) school district trustees; 8 (b) school administrators; 9 (c) teachers; 10 (d) school business officials; 11 (e) parents; and 12 (f) taxpayers. 13 (3) Prior to adoption or amendment of any accreditation standard, the board shall submit each 14 proposal, including the economic impact statement required under subsection (1), to: 15 (a) during a regular legislative session, the joint appropriations subcommittee on education; or 16 (b) during the legislative interim, the education interim budget committee established in 5-12-501, 17 for review at least 1 month in advance of a scheduled committee meeting. Information provided during an 18 interim must be provided to the legislature in accordance with 5-11-210. 19 (4) Unless the expenditures by school districts required under the proposal are determined by the 20 education interim appropriate committee under subsection (3) to be insubstantial expenditures that can be 21 readily absorbed into the budgets of existing district programs, the board may not implement the standard until 22 July 1 following: 23 (a) under subsection (3)(a), the current legislative session; or 24 (b) under subsection (3)(b), the next regular legislative session and shall request the 25 superintendent of public instruction include a request in the superintendent's budget that the same legislature 26 fund implementation of the proposed standard. 27 Amendment - 1st Reading/2nd House-blue - Requested by: Daniel Salomon - (S) Education and Cultural Resources 68th Legislature Drafter: Pad McCracken, 406-444-3595 HB0021.001.002 - 3 - Authorized Print Version – HB 21 (5) The provisions of this section may not be construed to reduce or limit the authority of the 1 education interim committee to review administrative rules, including accreditation standards, within its 2 jurisdiction pursuant to 5-5-215. 3 (5)(6) Standards for the retention of school records must be as pr
View Montana HB 21 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.