Massachusetts H 4769: An Act authorizing remote participation at representative town meetings due to the COVID-19 emergency
Status: Accompanied a new draft, see H4849 (as of 2020-07-09)
State: Massachusetts · Session: 191st · Bill: H 4769
Sponsors: Daniel R. Carey, David M. Rogers, David Paul Linsky, Hannah Kane, John Barrett, III, Louis L. Kafka, Michael J. Barrett, Michael J. Finn, Michael O. Moore, Michelle L. Ciccolo, Nika C. Elugardo, Richard M. Haggerty, Sean Garballey, Tami L. Gouveia, Tommy Vitolo, William M. Straus
Bill Text
1 of 1 HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 5024 FILED ON: 4/10/2020 HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 4769 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts _________________ PRESENTED BY: Michelle L. Ciccolo and Tommy Vitolo _________________ To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General Court assembled: The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill: An Act authorizing remote participation at representative town meetings due to the COVID-19 emergency. _______________ PETITION OF: NAME: DISTRICT/ADDRESS: DATE ADDED: Michelle L. Ciccolo 15th Middlesex 4/10/2020 Tommy Vitolo 15th Norfolk 4/10/2020 Nika C. Elugardo 15th Suffolk 4/16/2020 Sean Garballey 23rd Middlesex 4/16/2020 David Paul Linsky 5th Middlesex 4/16/2020 Michael J. Barrett Third Middlesex 4/16/2020 John Barrett, III 1st Berkshire 4/16/2020 Louis L. Kafka 8th Norfolk 4/16/2020 William M. Straus 10th Bristol 4/16/2020 Daniel R. Carey 2nd Hampshire 4/16/2020 Tami L. Gouveia 14th Middlesex 4/17/2020 David M. Rogers 24th Middlesex 4/17/2020 Hannah Kane 11th Worcester 4/17/2020 Michael J. Finn 6th Hampden 4/17/2020 Richard M. Haggerty 30th Middlesex 4/17/2020 Michael O. Moore Second Worcester 4/17/2020 1 of 6 HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 5024 FILED ON: 4/10/2020 HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 4769 By Representatives Ciccolo of Lexington and Vitolo of Brookline, a petition (subject to Joint Rule 12) of Michelle L. Ciccolo, Tommy Vitolo and others relative to authorizing remote participation at representative town meetings due to the COVID-19 emergency. Municipalities and Regional Government. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts _______________ In the One Hundred and Ninety-First General Court (2019-2020) _______________ An Act authorizing remote participation at representative town meetings due to the COVID-19 emergency. Whereas, The deferred operation of this act would tend to defeat its purpose, which is to protect both public health and the viability of town meetings in the face of the state, national, and global public health emergencies existing as a result of COVID-19 pandemic, therefore it is hereby declared to be an emergency law, necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health and convenience. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 SECTION 1. During the state of emergency declared by the governor on March 10, 2 2020, related to the COVID-19 pandemic, if the moderator in a town having a representative 3 town meeting form of government determines that it is not possible to safely assemble the town 4 meeting members and interested members of the public in a common location while complying 5 with any applicable state or local orders, directives, or guidance concerning public assemblies, 6 the moderator may, notwithstanding any general or special laws, charter provisions or bylaws to 7 the contrary, request the select board of said town to call for any such representative town 8 meeting to be held through remote participation by means of a video conferencing platform. 2 of 6 9 Any such request by the moderator to the select board shall be in writing and shall include the 10 following certifications and information: (a) the moderator’s determination and request to hold 11 any town meeting through remote participation in accordance with this section; (b) the video 12 conferencing platform the moderator has determined to use to hold the town meeting; (c) a 13 certification that the moderator has consulted with the local disability commission or coordinator 14 for Americans with Disabilities Act compliance and has received recommendations for ensuring 15 the highest level of feasible access to the public; and (d) a certification that the moderator has 16 tested the video conferencing platform to his or her satisfaction to confirm that it will enable the 17 town meeting to be conducted in substantially the same manner as if the meeting occurred in 18 person at a physical location, including (i) the ability for the moderator, all town meeting 19 members, other town officials and any other interested members of the public to identify and 20 hear the moderator and each town meeting member who attends and participates in the remotely- 21 held town meeting, (ii) the ability to determine whether a quorum is present, (iii) the ability for 22 the moderator to determine when a town meeting member wishes to be recognized to speak, 23 make a motion, raise a point of order or object to a request for unanimous consent, (iv) the ability 24 for the moderator to recognize a town meeting member or town official to speak and to enable 25 that person to speak; (v) the ability to conduct a roll-call vote, (vi) the ability for any interested 26 members of the public to access the meeting remotely for purposes of witnessing the 27 deliberations and actions taken at the town mee
View Massachusetts H 4769 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.