Nevada SB 415: Authorizes the installation and use of an automated traffic enforcement system under certain circumstances. (BDR 43-422)
Status: (Pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.1, no further action allowed.) (as of 2025-04-12)
State: Nevada · Session: 83 · Bill: SB 415
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Growth and Infrastructure
Bill Text
S.B. 415 - *SB415* SENATE BILL NO. 415–COMMITTEE ON GROWTH AND INFRASTRUCTURE (ON BEHALF OF THE JOINT INTERIM STANDING COMMITTEE ON GROWTH AND INFRASTRUCTURE) MARCH 20, 2025 ____________ Referred to Committee on Growth and Infrastructure SUMMARY—Authorizes the installation and use of an automated traffic enforcement system under certain circumstances. (BDR 43-422) FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: No. Effect on the State: Yes. ~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new; matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted. AN ACT relating to public safety; authorizing the installation and use of an automated traffic enforcement system by a governmental entity under certain circumstances; setting forth the requirements for the installation and use of an automated traffic enforcement system; establishing provisions governing the issuance of a civil infraction citation based on evidence detected by an automated traffic enforcement system; requiring the Department of Transportation to adopt certain regulations; requiring the Advisory Committee on Traffic Safety to provide certain recommendations to the Department; prohibiting an insurer from increasing rates for motor vehicle insurance under certain circumstances; and providing other matters properly relating thereto. Legislative Counsel’s Digest: Existing law prohibits a governmental entity or any agent thereof from using 1 photographic, video or digital equipment to gather evidence in order to issue a 2 traffic citation or civil infraction citation, unless the equipment is: (1) a portable 3 camera or event recording device worn or held by a peace officer; (2) installed 4 within a vehicle or facility of a law enforcement agency; or (3) privately owned by 5 a nongovernmental entity. (NRS 484A.600) Sections 2 and 3 of this bill create an 6 exception to this prohibition, authorizing a governmental entity to allow for the 7 – 2 – - *SB415* installation and use of an automated traffic enforcement system to enforce 8 provisions of law governing speeding and obedience to traffic-control devices 9 under certain circumstances. Specifically, section 2 requires the governmental 10 entity to: (1) make certain findings about the location where the automated traffic 11 enforcement system will be installed; (2) provide for or undertake a public 12 information campaign about the automated traffic enforcement system; and (3) 13 comply with certain regulations required to be adopted by the Department of 14 Transportation related to automated traffic enforcement system and warning signs. 15 Section 7 of this bill requires the Advisory Committee on Traffic Safety to provide 16 recommendations to the Department related to these regulations. 17 If a governmental entity authorizes the installation and use of an automated 18 traffic enforcement system, section 2 requires a peace officer of a law enforcement 19 agency with jurisdiction over the location of the automated traffic enforcement 20 system to review the evidence of a violation detected by an automated traffic 21 enforcement system before a civil infraction citation is issued. Section 2 also 22 establishes requirements for the contents and delivery of the civil infraction citation 23 issued based upon evidence collected by an automated traffic enforcement system. 24 Section 2 creates a rebuttable presumption that the registered owner of a vehicle is 25 the driver of the vehicle at the time of a violation detected by an automated traffic 26 enforcement system and provides a method for rebutting this presumption. 27 Section 2 provides that a violation detected by an automated traffic 28 enforcement system is not a moving traffic violation but is punishable by a civil 29 penalty. Additionally, section 2 requires money received from such civil penalties 30 to be used for certain purposes related to defraying the costs of the automated 31 traffic enforcement system. Section 6 of this bill makes a conforming change 32 related to the deposit of money received from such civil penalties. 33 Sections 1, 4 and 5 of this bill make conforming changes to: (1) exclude traffic 34 violations detected by an automated traffic enforcement system from an assessment 35 of demerit points; and (2) provide for the issuance of a civil infraction citation for 36 violations detected by an automated traffic enforcement system. 37 Existing law prohibits an insurer from increasing insurance rates or cancelling 38 or refusing to renew an insurance policy if a juvenile court enters a conviction or 39 finding of certain violations relating to speeding. (NRS 690B.028) Section 8 of this 40 bill additionally prohibits a civil infraction citation issued for a violation detected 41 by an automated traffic enforcement system from being used for such purposes. 42 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. NRS 483.473 is hereby amended to read as follows: 1 483.473 1.
View Nevada SB 415 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.