Connecticut SB 278: AN ACT CONCERNING A PLAN TO PARTNER WITH MANUFACTURERS TO PROVIDE EQUIPMENT TO SCHOOLS.
Status: PUBLIC HEARING 0310 (as of 2020-03-06)
State: Connecticut · Session: 2020 · Bill: SB 278
Subjects: MANUFACTURERS AND MANUFACTURING. see also HIGH TECHNOLOGY, Community and school, Economic and Community Development, Department of, Reports, Vocational education equipment, Workforce development
Sponsors: Commerce Committee
Bill Text
LCO 1 of 6 General Assembly Substitute Bill No. 278 February Session, 2026 AN ACT CONCERNING MILITARY PROTECTIVE ORDERS TO ADDRESS MILITARY INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened: Section 1. Subsection (b) of section 46b-15 of the 2026 supplement to 1 the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu 2 thereof (Effective October 1, 2026): 3 (b) The application form shall allow the applicant, at the applicant's 4 option, to indicate whether the respondent holds a permit to carry a 5 pistol or revolver, an eligibility certificate for a pistol or revolver, a long 6 gun eligibility certificate or an ammunition certificate or possesses one 7 or more firearms or ammunition. The application shall be accompanied 8 by an affidavit made under oath which includes a brief statement of the 9 conditions from which relief is sought. Upon receipt of the application 10 the court shall order that a hearing on the application be held not later 11 than fourteen days from the date of the order except that, if the 12 application indicates that the respondent holds a permit to carry a pistol 13 or revolver, an eligibility certificate for a pistol or revolver, a long gun 14 eligibility certificate or an ammunition certificate or possesses one or 15 more firearms or ammunition, and the court orders an ex parte order, 16 the court shall order that a hearing be held on the application not later 17 than seven days from the date on which the ex parte order is issued. The 18 court, in its discretion, may make such orders as it deems appropriate 19 Substitute Bill No. 278 LCO 2 of 6 for the protection of the applicant and such dependent children or other 20 persons as the court sees fit. In making such orders ex parte, the court, 21 in its discretion, may consider relevant court records if the records are 22 available to the public from a clerk of the Superior Court or on the 23 Judicial Branch's Internet web site. In addition, at the time of the 24 hearing, the court, in its discretion, may also consider a report prepared 25 by the family services unit of the Judicial Branch, provided the person 26 who prepared such report is available to testify at the hearing and is 27 subject to cross examination. The report may include, as available: Any 28 existing or prior orders of protection obtained from the [protection 29 order] registry of protective orders maintained pursuant to section 51-30 5c, as amended by this act, including any military protective orders 31 contained in such registry; information on any pending criminal case or 32 past criminal case in which the respondent was convicted of a violent 33 crime; any outstanding arrest warrant for the respondent; and the 34 respondent's level of risk based on a risk assessment tool utilized by the 35 Court Support Services Division. The report may also include 36 information pertaining to any pending or disposed family matters case 37 involving the applicant and respondent. Any report provided by the 38 Court Support Services Division to the court shall also be provided to 39 the applicant and respondent. Such orders may include temporary child 40 custody or visitation rights, and such relief may include, but is not 41 limited to, an order enjoining the respondent from (1) imposing any 42 restraint upon the person or liberty of the applicant; (2) threatening, 43 harassing, assaulting, molesting, sexually assaulting or attacking the 44 applicant; or (3) entering the family dwelling or the dwelling of the 45 applicant. Such order may include provisions necessary to protect any 46 animal owned or kept by the applicant including, but not limited to, an 47 order enjoining the respondent from injuring or threatening to injure 48 such animal. If an applicant alleges an immediate and present physical 49 danger to the applicant, the court may issue an ex parte order granting 50 such relief as it deems appropriate. If a postponement of a hearing on 51 the application is requested by either party and granted, the ex parte 52 order shall not be continued except upon agreement of the parties or by 53 order of the court for good cause shown. If a hearing on the application 54 Substitute Bill No. 278 LCO 3 of 6 is scheduled or an ex parte order is granted and the court is closed on 55 the scheduled hearing date, the hearing shall be held on the next day the 56 court is open and any such ex parte order shall remain in effect until the 57 date of such hearing. If the applicant is under eighteen years of age, a 58 parent, guardian or responsible adult who brings the application as next 59 friend of the applicant may not speak on the applicant's behalf at such 60 hearing unless there is good cause shown as to why the applicant is 61 unable to speak on his or her own behalf, except that nothing in this 62 subsection shall preclude such parent, guardian or responsible adult 63 from testifying as a witness at
View Connecticut SB 278 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.