California SB 424: Initiative petitions.

Bill Text

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 
 Bill Text - SB-424 California Environmental Quality Act: expired regional habitat conservation plan: exemption.

• 

• skip to content

• home

• accessibility

• FAQ

• feedback

• sitemap

• login

• x

 Quick Search:

 Bill Number
 Bill Keyword

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• Home

• Bill Information

• California Law

• Publications

• Other Resources

• My Subscriptions

• My Favorites

• Bill Information
 >>

• Bill Search
 >>

• Text

 Bill Text

 PDF2
 Bill PDF

 |Add To My Favorites |Track Bill | Version: 03/25/25 - Amended Senate
 02/18/25 - Introduced

 SB-424 California Environmental Quality Act: expired regional habitat conservation plan: exemption.(2025-2026)

 Text

 >>

 Votes

 >>

 History
 >>

 Bill Analysis
 >>

 Today's Law As Amended
 >>

 Compare Versions
 >>

 Status
 >>

 Comments To Author

 >>

 Track Bill
 >>

 Add To My Favorites
 >>

 SHARE THIS:

 Date Published: 03/25/2025 09:00 PM

SB424:v98#DOCUMENTBill Start

 Amended
 IN 
 Senate
 March 25, 2025

 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
 2025–2026 REGULAR SESSION

 Senate Bill

No. 424

Introduced by Senator Grove

February 18, 2025

 An act to amend Section 21000 of add Section 21080.54 to the Public Resources Code, relating to environmental quality. 

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

SB 424, as amended, Grove.
 California Environmental Quality Act. Act: expired regional habitat conservation plan: exemption.

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment.

CEQA makes various legislative findings and declarations regarding the maintenance of a quality environment for the people of this state and states
 the intent of the Legislature for state agencies to regulate activities so that major consideration is given to preventing environmental damage.

This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to those findings and declarations, and to the statement of intent.

This bill would exempt from the requirements of CEQA a project developed solely to serve an urgent public health or housing need, as specified, that is within the boundaries of an expired regional habitat conservation plan, and that had an environmental review completed consistent with the requirements of the regional habitat conservation plan as the plan existed before the plan’s expiration. Because the bill would require a lead agency to determine the applicability of this exemption, the bill would impose a state-mandated local
 program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Digest Key

 Vote:
 MAJORITY 
 Appropriation:
 NO 
 Fiscal Committee:
 NOYES 
 Local Program:
 NOYES 

Bill Text

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1.

 Section 21080.54 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:

21080.54.

 This division does not apply to a project that meets all of the following criteria:

(a) The project is developed solely to serve an urgent public health or housing need as established by federal or state policy on less than 15 acres in an urbanized area.

(b) The project is within the boundaries of an expired regional habitat conservation plan.

(c) An environmental review for the project was completed consistent with the requirements of the regional habitat conservation plan as the plan existed before the plan’s expiration. 

SEC. 2.

 No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.

SECTION 1.Section 21000 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:

21000.The Legislature finds and declares as follows:

(a)The maintenance of a quality environment for the people of this state now and in the future is a matter of statewide concern.

(b)It is necessary to provide a high-quality environment that at all times is healthful and pleasing to the senses and intellect of people.

(c)There is a need to understand the relationship b