Pennsylvania HB 1752: An Act amending the act of March 10, 1949 (P.L.30, No.14), known as the Public School Code of 1949, in preliminary provisions, providing for Keystone Exam alternative feasibility study.
Status: Referred to Education (as of 2026-05-07)
State: Pennsylvania · Session: 2025-2026 · Bill: HB 1752
Sponsors: Gina Curry, Jason Ortitay, Tarah Probst, Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz, Nikki Rivera, Carol Hill-Evans, La'Tasha Mayes, Steve Samuelson, Keith Harris, Lisa Borowski, G. Roni Green, Jeremy Shaffer, Jill Cooper
Bill Text
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO. 2159 PRINTER'S NO. 3064 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL No. 1752 Session of 2025 INTRODUCED BY CURRY, ORTITAY, PROBST, CEPEDA-FREYTIZ, RIVERA, HILL-EVANS, MAYES, SAMUELSON, K. HARRIS, BOROWSKI AND GREEN, JULY 21, 2025 AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AS AMENDED, MARCH 24, 2026 AN ACT Amending the act of March 10, 1949 (P.L.30, No.14), entitled "An act relating to the public school system, including certain provisions applicable as well to private and parochial schools; amending, revising, consolidating and changing the laws relating thereto," in preliminary provisions, providing for Keystone Exam alternative feasibility study. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows: Section 1. The act of March 10, 1949 (P.L.30, No.14), known as the Public School Code of 1949, is amended by adding a section to read: Section 121.2. Keystone Exam Alternative Feasibility Study.--(a) The secretary shall contract for an independent study to determine whether the ACT and SAT may be administered in lieu of ACT, SAT OR SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENTS MAY REPLACE the current Statewide, standardized Keystone Exams in literature, algebra I and biology for high school students consistent with Federal requirements under 20 U.S.C. § 6311(b) (2)(H) 6311(B) (relating to state plans). <-- <-- <-- <-- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 (b) The secretary shall submit, within one year after the effective date of this subsection, a report containing the results of the study and recommendations to the Governor, the chairperson and minority chairperson of the Education Committee of the Senate and , the chairperson and minority chairperson of the Education Committee of the House of Representatives AND THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION . The study shall include the following: (1) An evaluation of the degree to which the ACT and SAT , SAT AND SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENTS align with Pennsylvania core academic standards and are suitable for use in lieu of the Statewide Keystone Exams in literature, algebra I and biology. (2) Studies, research and analyses required to determine the extent to which the ACT and SAT test results , SAT AND SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENTS provide comparable, valid and reliable data on student achievement as compared to the Keystone Exams for all students and for each subgroup of students. (3) A determination of whether the ACT and SAT , SAT AND SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENTS provide testing accommodations that permit students with disabilities and English learners the opportunity to participate in each assessment and receive comparable benefits. (4) Analyses to determine whether the ACT and SAT , SAT AND SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENTS provide unbiased, rational and consistent differentiation among schools within the Commonwealth's accountability system. (5) An evaluation to determine whether the ACT and SAT , SAT AND SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENTS meet the criteria for technical quality that all Statewide assessments must meet for Federal assessment peer review. (6) AN ESTIMATE OF THE NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL STUDENTS WHO 20250HB1752PN3064 - 2 - <-- <-- <-- <-- <-- <-- <-- <-- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 WOULD BE TAKING THE ACT, SAT AND SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENTS COMPARED TO CURRENT KEYSTONE EXAM PARTICIPATION RATES. (7) AN EXAMINATION OF THE POTENTIAL ANNUAL COST TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF ADMINISTERING THE ACT, SAT AND SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE TESTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY REQUIREMENTS OF THE ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT OF 1965 (PUBLIC LAW 89-10, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 ET SEQ.), AS AMENDED BY THE EVERY STUDENT SUCCEEDS ACT (PUBLIC LAW 114-95, 129 STAT. 1802). THE EXAMINATION SHALL INCLUDE AN ANALYSIS OF ANNUAL COSTS INCURRED BY STATES USING THE ACT OR SAT AND HOW COSTS HAVE CHANGED OVER TIME. (8) A SUMMARY OF HOW THE DEPARTMENT AND SCHOOL ENTITIES WOULD TRANSITION TO THE USE OF NEW ASSESSMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE TESTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY REQUIREMENTS OF THE ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED BY THE EVERY STUDENT SUCCEEDS ACT, INCLUDING A PROPOSED TIMELINE AND AN ESTIMATE OF TRANSITION COSTS. (9) A SUMMARY AND COMPARISON OF TESTING PROCEDURES FOR THE ACT, SAT AND SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENTS, INCLUDING WHEN TESTS ARE PROCTORED AND TIMELINES FOR THE RELEASE OF RESULTS. (10) A SUMMARY AND COMPARISON OF THE EXISTING RESEARCH ON THE CORRELATION BETWEEN PERFORMANCE ON THE ACT, SAT AND SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENTS AND PERFORMANCE ON THE KEYSTONE EXAMS. (11) A LISTING OF THE LANGUAGES IN WHICH THE ACT, SAT AND SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENTS ARE AVAILABLE. (12) AN ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF THOSE ASSESSMENTS THAT USE A COMPARATIVE-PERCENTILE MEASURE OF STUDENT PERFORMANCE AND THOSE ASSESSMENTS THAT USE A PROFICIENCY DETERMINATION TO MEASURE STUDENT PERFORMANCE. (13) AN ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENE
View Pennsylvania HB 1752 on LegisTrack → — full text, sponsors, votes, campaign finance, and cross-state matches.